IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/fufsci/v8y2026i1ne70036.html

A Vulnerability Lens for Intuitive‐Logic Scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Guido Fioretti

Abstract

Exploration of possibilities by means of intuitive logic is hampered by a large number of scenarios, which easily exceed the limits imposed by human bounded rationality. While many practitioners constrain their scenarios within a 2 × 2 $2\times 2$ matrix by design, more structured approaches point to rationales such as eliminating contradictory possibilities, adding opposites to increase diversity, and checking the vulnerability of scenarios with respect to contingencies that are out of control. In general, vulnerability evaluation is based on the assessment of probabilities. With this paper, I propose an evaluation of scenarios' vulnerability based on the structure of connections between evoked alternatives and perceived consequences. Since this method does not require any probability assessment, it can be applied even when reliable estimates of probabilities are not available.

Suggested Citation

  • Guido Fioretti, 2026. "A Vulnerability Lens for Intuitive‐Logic Scenarios," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:fufsci:v:8:y:2026:i:1:n:e70036
    DOI: 10.1002/ffo2.70036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.70036
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ffo2.70036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:fufsci:v:8:y:2026:i:1:n:e70036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2573-5152 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.