IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/fufsci/v8y2026i1ne70030.html

Futures of Everyday Life: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Future Personas in Scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Gerhard Schönhofer
  • Pauli Komonen
  • Jan Oliver Schwarz
  • Laura Bechthold

Abstract

Scenario reports, holding a long‐standing tradition in foresight and futures studies, act as an essential document for organizations to prepare for possible, plausible, and alternative futures. Focusing on descriptions and representations of everyday life, we examined 29 future persona narratives from six publications—covering a wide field from public to private sector—through qualitative content analysis. Our guiding question is: How can anthropological perspectives such as cultural relativism or postcolonial discourses contribute to an in‐depth, qualitative interpretation depictions of future everyday life? Acknowledging anthropology's colonial origins and its growing commitment to the interests of indigenous and other marginalized groups, we offer alternative readings of prominent scenario reports. Our findings suggest that scenario reports, in addition to anticipating possible futures, construct certain futures based on a systematic analysis of empirical data but also speculative interpretation. The results of these interpretative acts often appear elitist, stereotypical, and technocratic, often replicating dominant societal narratives rather than fostering substantive shifts in how the future is imagined. We therefore call for a more polyphonic representation of futures in scenario writing and foresight work that can produce more discontinuous and transformative images of the future. We understand polyphonic representations as coined by various independent, predominant as well as subaltern perspectives on the same issue at stake while being offered the same amount of space. Therefore, as we will indicate in our analysis, most of the reports referred to are rather monophonic and do not offer discuptive perspectives on the future of everyday life. As an avenue of methodological development, we propose a more nuanced and comprehensive perception of culture and social structures in scenario narrative writing. In addition, ethnographic methods could increase our understanding of how futures are collaboratively constructed and produced by different actors and their respective backgrounds and knowledge in scenario processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerhard Schönhofer & Pauli Komonen & Jan Oliver Schwarz & Laura Bechthold, 2026. "Futures of Everyday Life: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Future Personas in Scenarios," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:fufsci:v:8:y:2026:i:1:n:e70030
    DOI: 10.1002/ffo2.70030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.70030
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ffo2.70030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rohrbeck, René & Schwarz, Jan Oliver, 2013. "The value contribution of strategic foresight: Insights from an empirical study of large European companies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(8), pages 1593-1606.
    2. Fabrice Roubelat, 2000. "Scenario Planning as a Networking Process," Post-Print hal-02148889, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jessica M. K. Streit & Sarah A. Felknor & Nicole T. Edwards & John Howard, 2021. "Leveraging Strategic Foresight to Advance Worker Safety, Health, and Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Asan, Umut & Erhan Bozdag, Cafer & Polat, Seçkin, 2004. "A fuzzy approach to qualitative cross impact analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 443-458, December.
    3. Elizabeth Gibson & Tugrul Daim & Edwin Garces & Marina Dabic, 2018. "Technology Foresight: A Bibliometric Analysis to Identify Leading and Emerging Methods," Foresight and STI Governance, National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 6-24.
    4. Thomas Spengler & Sebastian Herzog, 2023. "Defuzzification in Scenario Management – A theoretical and practical Guide," FEMM Working Papers 23005, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Faculty of Economics and Management.
    5. Christoph Markmann & Alexander Spickermann & Heiko A. von der Gracht & Alexander Brem, 2021. "Improving the question formulation in Delphi‐like surveys: Analysis of the effects of abstract language and amount of information on response behavior," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1), March.
    6. Haarhaus, Tim & Liening, Andreas, 2020. "Building dynamic capabilities to cope with environmental uncertainty: The role of strategic foresight," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    7. Theresa C. Schropp & Jan Oliver Schwarz & Fabian Buder, 2024. "Corporate foresight in light of the COVID‐19 pandemic—The crisis as a driver?," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(2), June.
    8. María Reyes‐Parga & Àlex Rialp‐Criado & Viviana Gutierrez‐Rincon, 2026. "Leveraging Organizational Ambidexterity for Sustained Growth in Agri‐Food Born Global Firms: A Strategic Foresight Approach," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), April.
    9. Francesco Facchini & Joanna Oleśków-Szłapka & Luigi Ranieri & Andrea Urbinati, 2019. "A Maturity Model for Logistics 4.0: An Empirical Analysis and a Roadmap for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Sarpong, David & Maclean, Mairi, 2016. "Cultivating strategic foresight in practise: A relational perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2812-2820.
    11. Alexey Bereznoy, 2019. "Corporate Foresight In The Strategy Of Multinationals," HSE Working papers WP BRP 97/STI/2019, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    12. Lee, Changyong & Song, Bomi & Park, Yongtae, 2015. "An instrument for scenario-based technology roadmapping: How to assess the impacts of future changes on organisational plans," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 90(PA), pages 285-301.
    13. Zeng, Michael A., 2018. "Foresight by online communities – The case of renewable energies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 27-42.
    14. Landoni, Matteo & ogilvie, dt, 2019. "Convergence of innovation policies in the European aerospace industry (1960–2000)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 174-184.
    15. Toro-Jarrín, Miguel Angel & Ponce-Jaramillo, Idalia Estefania & Güemes-Castorena, David, 2016. "Methodology for the of building process integration of Business Model Canvas and Technological Roadmap," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 213-225.
    16. Favato, Giampiero & Vecchiato, Riccardo, 2017. "Embedding real options in scenario planning: A new methodological approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 135-149.
    17. Léo-Paul Dana & Aidin Salamzadeh & Samira Mortazavi & Morteza Hadizadeh & Mahnaz Zolfaghari, 2022. "Strategic Futures Studies and Entrepreneurial Resiliency: A Focus on Digital Technology Trends and Emerging Markets," TEC Empresarial, School of Business, Costa Rica Institute of Technology (ITCR), vol. 16(1), pages 87-100.
    18. Aggestam, Filip & Wolfslehner, Bernhard, 2018. "Deconstructing a complex future: Scenario development and implications for the forest-based sector," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 21-26.
    19. Key Pousttchi & Yvonne Hufenbach, 2011. "Value Creation in the Mobile Market," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 3(5), pages 299-311, October.
    20. Klos, Christoph & Spieth, Patrick, 2021. "READY, STEADY, DIGITAL?! How foresight activities do (NOT) affect individual technological frames for managerial SENSEMAKING," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:fufsci:v:8:y:2026:i:1:n:e70030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2573-5152 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.