IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/fufsci/v7y2025i3ne70021.html

How Discriminative Artificial Intelligence Drives Scenario Planning: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Laura M. Berensmeier
  • Valentin J. Schmitt
  • Martin G. Moehrle

Abstract

This article explores the potential of discriminative Artificial Intelligence (AI) to enhance scenario planning, a widely used methodology in strategic planning. Like others, scenario planning also faces the challenge of efficiently integrating available information. We address this challenge by investigating two research questions: First, how is discriminative AI currently applied in scenario planning? Second, how could discriminative AI techniques additionally be used to support the stakeholders of scenario planning? A systematic literature review identifies 58 relevant documents that illustrate the application of discriminative AI in several stages of the scenario process. We present six key findings in relation to the purpose of discriminative AI, the data used and the spectrum of topics. We then formulate seven research propositions that serve as a research agenda and highlight further potential for the utilization of discriminative AI. Our contribution to science is that we show how the roles of stakeholders are going to change. For management, we demonstrate the numerous opportunities offered by discriminative AI to improve the quality of scenario planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura M. Berensmeier & Valentin J. Schmitt & Martin G. Moehrle, 2025. "How Discriminative Artificial Intelligence Drives Scenario Planning: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(3), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:fufsci:v:7:y:2025:i:3:n:e70021
    DOI: 10.1002/ffo2.70021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.70021
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ffo2.70021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:fufsci:v:7:y:2025:i:3:n:e70021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2573-5152 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.