IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/fufsci/v7y2025i3ne70019.html

Stakeholder‐Driven Consequence Modeling Employing Cross‐Impact Balance Scenario Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Brauner
  • Stefan Vögele

Abstract

Future research, including participatory research, can help to explore stakeholder perspectives. This capability is observable in scenario methods such as the cross‐impact balance analysis that aggregates factors from which scenarios and further research opportunities are derivable. In this methodologically oriented paper, a modeling idea is explored, in which consequences are considered as flexible factors in the modeling process, rather than drawing on fixed impact‐consequence linkages. The study proposes an extension that explicitly models implicitly acting consequences to increase stakeholder involvement and system understanding. In this regard, the manuscript argues that this approach enables reflection on the modeling and potential results during this process, as they are constructed around these consequences or, more generally, system indicators. Thus, this approach provides an opportunity to integrate cross‐impact assessment more effectively into stakeholder dialog by facilitating the tracking and discussion of structures. The study also illustrates the methodological approach by highlighting its application to the topic of water governance. In addition to the potential for utilizing this approach in workshops and participatory co‐modeling, the most significant initial finding of this study is that the explication of consequences could serve as a suitable foundation for further studies focusing on stakeholder involvement or impact analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Brauner & Stefan Vögele, 2025. "Stakeholder‐Driven Consequence Modeling Employing Cross‐Impact Balance Scenario Analysis," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(3), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:fufsci:v:7:y:2025:i:3:n:e70019
    DOI: 10.1002/ffo2.70019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.70019
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ffo2.70019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:fufsci:v:7:y:2025:i:3:n:e70019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2573-5152 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.