IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/fufsci/v7y2025i1ne208.html

Who Will Govern Cybersecurity in Spain by 2035? Results From a Delphi Study

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Del‐Real
  • Antonio M. Díaz‐Fernández

Abstract

This study explores the future of cybersecurity governance in Spain by 2035, focusing on the roles of public and private actors. Using a two‐round Delphi method, we collected insights from experts to evaluate the probability, desirability, and impact of 20 projections for Spain's cybersecurity landscape. The findings suggest a consolidation of multi‐stakeholder forms of governance, with public agencies like INCIBE and CCN guiding policy and oversight while private entities deliver essential services. Experts foresee continued collaboration between national and EU institutions, with the EU playing a key role in regulatory coordination. Three governance scenarios emerged: public‐centric cybersecurity governance, state‐driven cybersecurity assurance, and private monopolistic provision. These scenarios underscore a complex multistakeholder model shaped by collaboration and tension between public and private actors, particularly in light of fragmented ownership over cyberspace resources. This study highlights the need for adaptable governance frameworks that balance regulatory oversight with private sector efficiency, providing insights for stakeholders as they prepare for evolving cyber threats.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Del‐Real & Antonio M. Díaz‐Fernández, 2025. "Who Will Govern Cybersecurity in Spain by 2035? Results From a Delphi Study," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(1), April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:fufsci:v:7:y:2025:i:1:n:e208
    DOI: 10.1002/ffo2.208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.208
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ffo2.208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valentin Weber, 2018. "Linking cyber strategy with grand strategy: the case of the United States," Journal of Cyber Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 236-257, May.
    2. Melissa K. Griffith, 2018. "A comprehensive security approach: bolstering Finnish cybersecurity capacity," Journal of Cyber Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 407-429, September.
    3. von der Gracht, Heiko A. & Darkow, Inga-Lena, 2010. "Scenarios for the logistics services industry: A Delphi-based analysis for 2025," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 46-59, September.
    4. Rowe, Gene & Wright, George, 1999. "The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 353-375, October.
    5. Tai Ming Cheung, 2018. "The rise of China as a cybersecurity industrial power: balancing national security, geopolitical, and development priorities," Journal of Cyber Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 306-326, September.
    6. Helena Carrapico & Benjamin Farrand, 2021. "When Trust Fades, Facebook Is No Longer a Friend: Shifting Privatisation Dynamics in the Context of Cybersecurity as a Result of Disinformation, Populism and Political Uncertainty," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1160-1176, September.
    7. Jamie Collier, 2018. "Cyber Security Assemblages: A Framework for Understanding the Dynamic and Contested Nature of Security Provision," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 13-21.
    8. Jamie Collier, 2018. "Cyber Security Assemblages: A Framework for Understanding the Dynamic and Contested Nature of Security Provision," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 13-21.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Di Zio, Simone & Bolzan, Mario & Marozzi, Marco, 2021. "Classification of Delphi outputs through robust ranking and fuzzy clustering for Delphi-based scenarios," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    2. Marco Marozzi & Mario Bolzan & Simone Di Zio, 2024. "Robust weighted aggregation of expert opinions in futures studies," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(3), pages 1471-1493, November.
    3. Belton, Ian & MacDonald, Alice & Wright, George & Hamlin, Iain, 2019. "Improving the practical application of the Delphi method in group-based judgment: A six-step prescription for a well-founded and defensible process," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 72-82.
    4. Förster, Bernadette & von der Gracht, Heiko, 2014. "Assessing Delphi panel composition for strategic foresight — A comparison of panels based on company-internal and external participants," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 215-229.
    5. Gebhardt, Maximilian & Spieske, Alexander & Birkel, Hendrik, 2022. "The future of the circular economy and its effect on supply chain dependencies: Empirical evidence from a Delphi study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    6. Hop, G.E. & Mourits, M.C.M. & Oude Lansink, A.G.J.M. & Saatkamp, H.W., 2014. "Future structural developments in Dutch and German livestock production and implications for contagious livestock disease control," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 95-114.
    7. Fritschy, Carolin & Spinler, Stefan, 2019. "The impact of autonomous trucks on business models in the automotive and logistics industry–a Delphi-based scenario study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    8. Winkler, Jens & Kuklinski, Christian Paul Jian-Wei & Moser, Roger, 2015. "Decision making in emerging markets: The Delphi approach's contribution to coping with uncertainty and equivocality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 1118-1126.
    9. Peppel, Marcel & Ringbeck, Jürgen & Spinler, Stefan, 2022. "How will last-mile delivery be shaped in 2040? A Delphi-based scenario study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    10. Yuri Calleo & Simone Di Zio & Francesco Pilla, 2023. "Facilitating spatial consensus in complex future scenarios through Real‐Time Spatial Delphi: A novel web‐based open platform," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(3-4), September.
    11. Tim Stevens, 2018. "Global Cybersecurity: New Directions in Theory and Methods," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 1-4.
    12. Engelke, Henning & Mauksch, Stefanie & Darkow, Inga-Lena & von der Gracht, Heiko A., 2015. "Opportunities for social enterprise in Germany — Evidence from an expert survey," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 90(PB), pages 635-646.
    13. Merfeld, Katrin & Wilhelms, Mark-Philipp & Henkel, Sven & Kreutzer, Karin, 2019. "Carsharing with shared autonomous vehicles: Uncovering drivers, barriers and future developments – A four-stage Delphi study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 66-81.
    14. Büchel, Hendrik & Spinler, Stefan, 2024. "The impact of the metaverse on e-commerce business models – A delphi-based scenario study," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    15. Schlecht, Laura & Schneider, Sabrina & Buchwald, Arne, 2021. "The prospective value creation potential of Blockchain in business models: A delphi study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    16. Kopyto, Matthias & Lechler, Sabrina & von der Gracht, Heiko A. & Hartmann, Evi, 2020. "Potentials of blockchain technology in supply chain management: Long-term judgments of an international expert panel," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    17. Zeng, Michael A. & Koller, Hans & Jahn, Reimo, 2019. "Open radar groups: The integration of online communities into open foresight processes," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 204-217.
    18. Melander, Lisa & Dubois, Anna & Hedvall, Klas & Lind, Frida, 2019. "Future goods transport in Sweden 2050: Using a Delphi-based scenario analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 178-189.
    19. Sahra Svensson-Hoglund & Jennifer D. Russell & Jessika Luth Richter & Paul Dewick & Leonidas Milios & Martin Calisto Friant & Anne P. M. Velenturf & Marianna Lena Kambanou & Rich Grousset & Sandra Gol, 2026. "Advancing Our Understanding of CE Loop Strategies: A Synthesizing Framework for Durable Consumer Products," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 1-33, April.
    20. Prommer, Lisa & Tiberius, Victor & Kraus, Sascha, 2020. "Exploring the future of startup leadership development," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:fufsci:v:7:y:2025:i:1:n:e208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2573-5152 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.