IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/fistud/v47y2026i2p177-193.html

Equivalisation (once again)

Author

Listed:
  • Karina Doorley
  • Luke Duggan
  • Theano Kakoulidou
  • Barra Roantree

Abstract

Income inequality and poverty statistics are often adjusted for differences in the size and composition of households, with common practice being to use a set of ‘equivalence scales’: a function of the number of adults and children in the household. However, different – largely ad hoc – scales have been adopted by international organisations and national statistical organisations with little explicit justification. We derive equivalence scales from the expenditure patterns of households using data from the 1987–2015 Irish Household Budget Survey. We find that the Engel, Rothbarth and demand system approaches all yield scales for children that are substantially smaller than those used by ad hoc official scales, with estimates from AIDS and QUAIDS demand systems appearing to decline over time. Such a decline is particularly noticeable when a 3SLS estimator is used to correct for the potential endogeneity of total expenditure, which also leads to substantially smaller estimated scales for both adults and children. This suggests an increase in economies of scale over the period we examine, with important implications for the measurement of poverty and inequality.

Suggested Citation

  • Karina Doorley & Luke Duggan & Theano Kakoulidou & Barra Roantree, 2026. "Equivalisation (once again)," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(2), pages 177-193, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:fistud:v:47:y:2026:i:2:p:177-193
    DOI: 10.1111/1475-5890.70025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.70025
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1475-5890.70025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:fistud:v:47:y:2026:i:2:p:177-193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1475-5890 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.