IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/fistud/v47y2026i1p89-106.html

Evaluating the impact of the UK job retention scheme on mental health and well‐being using matched difference‐in‐differences

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Deeming
  • Lateef Akanni

Abstract

In March 2020, the UK government implemented the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme, otherwise known as furlough, to minimise the impact of job losses. The UK furlough protected jobs during the COVID‐19 crisis, covering up to 80 per cent of a worker's monthly wage for hours not worked. We evaluate the causal effects of furlough on mental health, life satisfaction and loneliness, considering different labour market transitions in the pandemic. We employ a difference‐in‐differences estimator with propensity score matching, using data from the main stage and the COVID‐19 waves of Understanding Society, the UK Household Longitudinal Study. We show that furlough protected workers’ mental health and well‐being, compared with non‐furloughed workers and unemployment. We also find no detrimental effect on well‐being to being furloughed compared with continuous employment. The well‐being gains from furlough are particularly evident for those with pre‐existing health conditions. Overall, policies that mitigated negative labour market transitions during the pandemic had positive effects on the well‐being of the working population.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Deeming & Lateef Akanni, 2026. "Evaluating the impact of the UK job retention scheme on mental health and well‐being using matched difference‐in‐differences," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(1), pages 89-106, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:fistud:v:47:y:2026:i:1:p:89-106
    DOI: 10.1111/1475-5890.70010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.70010
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1475-5890.70010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:fistud:v:47:y:2026:i:1:p:89-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1475-5890 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.