IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/fistud/v46y2025i3p373-397.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy misperceptions, information, and the demand for redistributive tax reform: experimental evidence from Latin America

Author

Listed:
  • Martín Ardanaz
  • Evelyne Hübscher
  • Philip Keefer
  • Thomas Sattler

Abstract

Why do individuals fail to support tax reforms that serve their material self‐interest? Using an original online survey experiment spanning eight countries and 12,000 respondents across Latin America, one of the most unequal regions in the world, we find evidence for a previously unexplored explanation: misperceptions regarding the current incidence of the taxes to be reformed. Treated respondents who are informed that the value‐added tax (VAT) is regressive are significantly more likely to prefer reforms that make it more progressive. Treatment effects are driven by the large fraction of respondents who underestimate the regressivity of the VAT. They are disproportionately right‐leaning and more likely to attribute success to individual effort than luck; treatment effects are largest among individuals who hold these views of the world. Many respondents exhibit inconsistent preferences, violating the generalised axiom of revealed preferences; treatment effects are significantly stronger among consistent respondents. These findings expand the potential for information interventions to shift support for fiscal policy reforms protecting the most vulnerable.

Suggested Citation

  • Martín Ardanaz & Evelyne Hübscher & Philip Keefer & Thomas Sattler, 2025. "Policy misperceptions, information, and the demand for redistributive tax reform: experimental evidence from Latin America," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(3), pages 373-397, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:fistud:v:46:y:2025:i:3:p:373-397
    DOI: 10.1111/1475-5890.70001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.70001
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1475-5890.70001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:fistud:v:46:y:2025:i:3:p:373-397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1475-5890 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.