IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/fistud/v44y2023i1p53-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reducing complexity and compliance costs: a simplification safe harbour for the global minimum tax

Author

Listed:
  • Deborah Schanz

Abstract

I present a simplification safe harbour based on tax administrative guidance for Pillar Two, the global minimum tax, developed together with Cedric Döllefeld, Joachim Englisch, Simon Harst and Felix Siegel. It aims at reducing unnecessary compliance costs by avoiding effective tax rate (ETR) calculations if a minimum tax of 15 per cent has already been paid. The simplification safe harbour consists of a two‐level test to determine if a full GloBE ETR calculation is required from a multinational enterprise (MNE) or if a simplified ETR calculation or no calculation at all is sufficient. The test consists of a country‐level test and – only if necessary – an MNE‐level test. The country‐level test assesses a country's tax system. It seeks to determine whether the national tax system's nominal tax rates are (too) low and whether significant deviations between a country's tax base and the GloBE income exist. The second level, the MNE‐level test, is only carried out if the country‐level test has identified potential ‘red flags’. Even if this second test is required, the simplification safe harbour offers a significant reduction in compliance costs. This reduction is achieved by relying on national tax data, which are readily available in firms, instead of highly adjusted accounting data.

Suggested Citation

  • Deborah Schanz, 2023. "Reducing complexity and compliance costs: a simplification safe harbour for the global minimum tax," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(1), pages 53-60, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:fistud:v:44:y:2023:i:1:p:53-60
    DOI: 10.1111/1475-5890.12316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12316
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1475-5890.12316?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:fistud:v:44:y:2023:i:1:p:53-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1475-5890 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.