Author
Listed:
- Emiko Dupont
- Isa Marques
- Thomas Kneib
Abstract
In spatial regression models, unmeasured spatial variables, represented by spatial random effects, are typically not independent of observed covariates and can induce significant bias in covariate effect estimates. This fundamental problem, known as spatial confounding, has been extensively studied, but sometimes with puzzling and seemingly contradictory results. Here, we introduce a broad theoretical framework that brings mathematical clarity to spatial confounding. Our focus is the finite‐sample bias affecting simulation results and practical applications. Our intention is not to challenge existing results in the literature, but rather to build intuition and provide a unifying perspective that helps explain and connect them. We derive a compact analytical expression where, in the metric induced by the precision structure of the chosen analysis model, the bias is expressed in terms of the empirical correlation between a covariate and its confounder and their relative sizes. Thus, our formulation directly identifies these relationships as the key driver of bias; moreover, using the eigendecomposition of the precision structure, we obtain detailed quantitative characterizations of its behavior. The eigendecomposition has a natural interpretation as spatial frequencies and nonspatial information, with the eigenvalues encoding the precise effect of spatial smoothing in the model. This allows the insights from our bias expression to be translated into interpretable scenarios and explain subtle and counter‐intuitive behaviors. Finally, we propose a general strategy for addressing the bias in practice. When a covariate has nonspatial information, we show that a general form of the so‐called spatial+ method can reduce the bias. If not, explicit assumptions for identifiability are needed, and we develop a procedure in which multiple capped versions of spatial+ are applied. We illustrate our approach with an application to air temperature in Germany.
Suggested Citation
Emiko Dupont & Isa Marques & Thomas Kneib, 2026.
"Demystifying Spatial Confounding—A Unified Analytical Framework for the Bias in Covariate Effect Estimates,"
Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(6), September.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:envmet:v:37:y:2026:i:6:n:e70128
DOI: 10.1002/env.70128
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:envmet:v:37:y:2026:i:6:n:e70128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1180-4009/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.