Author
Listed:
- Weiqiang Zheng
- Shuguang Liu
- Zhengzheng Zhou
Abstract
Rainfall frequency analysis commonly presents results as confidence intervals around quantile estimates to account for uncertainty. However, standard bootstrap methods can introduce considerable errors, particularly when sample sizes are small. Focusing on the widely used Log‐logistic (LLO) distribution, this study proposes an approach based on pivotal quantities. By generating realizations from three joint pivotal quantities, the method enables the estimation of distribution parameters and return levels along with their associated uncertainties. Its performance is assessed through simulation experiments involving LLO distributions with varying shape parameters, and compared with the basic percentile bootstrap and the bias‐corrected and accelerated (BCa) bootstrap methods. The results indicate that the pivotal quantity method generally provides more accurate quantile estimates for both parameters and return levels, while showing lower sensitivity to the characteristics of the underlying distribution. The advantages are particularly evident under conditions commonly encountered in rainfall frequency analysis, such as small sample sizes, high return periods, and extreme confidence levels. The practical utility of the method is illustrated through a case study in Suzhou City, China, which highlights spatial variations in rainfall intensity and underscores the importance of accounting for heavy‐tail behavior at rain gauges with large values of the diagnostic variable Qk. Overall, the proposed pivotal quantity method provides a promising alternative for improving the reliability of statistical inference in rainfall frequency analysis.
Suggested Citation
Weiqiang Zheng & Shuguang Liu & Zhengzheng Zhou, 2026.
"Quantile Estimation in Rainfall Frequency Analysis With Log‐Logistic Distribution Using Pivotal Quantities: Method, Effect, and Application,"
Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(6), September.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:envmet:v:37:y:2026:i:6:n:e70110
DOI: 10.1002/env.70110
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:envmet:v:37:y:2026:i:6:n:e70110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1180-4009/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.