IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/envmet/v37y2026i5ne70113.html

The Q$$ Q $$‐Score: A Magnitude‐Weighted Goodness‐of‐Fit Score for Earthquake Forecasting

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Jansson Valter
  • Alejandra Arjon
  • Francesco Serafini
  • Frederic Schoenberg

Abstract

Accurate forecasting of large earthquakes is of great importance, yet most current earthquake forecast evaluation metrics, such as the log‐likelihood score, do not give additional weight to large‐magnitude events. To this end, magnitude‐weighted goodness‐of‐fit scores for earthquake forecasting have recently been introduced, such as potency‐weighted log‐likelihood and the Q$$ Q $$‐score. In this article, we investigate properties of the Q$$ Q $$‐score, which is a quotient emphasizing model fit for the largest 5% of earthquakes. We explore the theoretical properties of the Q$$ Q $$‐score, demonstrating that under certain null conditions, the expectations of the numerator and denominator are equal and thus the expectation of Q$$ Q $$ is 1 in a ratio sense. Additionally, the score satisfies a law of large numbers. We evaluated the Q$$ Q $$‐score of 21 next‐day gridded earthquake forecasts for California, provided by the Collaborative for the Study of Earthquake Predictability (CSEP) for the years 2012, 2014, and 2017. We also calculate the log‐likelihood scores of the forecasts to obtain a more comprehensive evaluation of how well different models perform, both for predicting the largest events and also in terms of overall model fit.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Jansson Valter & Alejandra Arjon & Francesco Serafini & Frederic Schoenberg, 2026. "The Q$$ Q $$‐Score: A Magnitude‐Weighted Goodness‐of‐Fit Score for Earthquake Forecasting," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(5), July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:envmet:v:37:y:2026:i:5:n:e70113
    DOI: 10.1002/env.70113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/env.70113
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/env.70113?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:envmet:v:37:y:2026:i:5:n:e70113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1180-4009/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.