IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/envmet/v37y2026i2ne70080.html

Estimation of Parameters in Inhomogeneous Neyman‐Scott Processes Using Presence/Absence Data

Author

Listed:
  • Magnus Ekström
  • Léna Gozé
  • Saskia Sandring
  • Bengt Gunnar Jonsson
  • Jörgen Wallerman
  • Göran Ståhl

Abstract

Environmental monitoring is of particular importance for studying biodiversity and ecosystems. Many environmental monitoring programs emphasize plant registrations as part of their inventory responsibilities. Among the various methods available for surveying plant communities, we focus on presence/absence (P/A) sampling due to its underutilized potential. P/A sampling offers several advantages over other methods, particularly its efficiency in terms of time and cost. However, interpreting direct information from this type of data can be challenging, as the results are heavily dependent on plot size and species distribution patterns. To overcome these difficulties, model‐based assumptions are necessary. In this article, we propose a method for estimating parameters of an inhomogeneous Neyman‐Scott point process, specifically a Matérn cluster process, using P/A data. The inhomogeneity is modeled by allowing the offspring process intensity to vary with environmental covariates. The proposed estimators and their corresponding confidence intervals are evaluated through Monte Carlo simulations and empirical data (P/A registrations for three plant species) collected by surveyors in Northern Sweden. The results indicate that the method generally produces nearly unbiased estimators, particularly when the sample size is sufficiently large. These parameter estimates from the underlying inhomogeneous Neyman‐Scott point process can subsequently be used to compute local estimates of expected plant density.

Suggested Citation

  • Magnus Ekström & Léna Gozé & Saskia Sandring & Bengt Gunnar Jonsson & Jörgen Wallerman & Göran Ståhl, 2026. "Estimation of Parameters in Inhomogeneous Neyman‐Scott Processes Using Presence/Absence Data," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(2), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:envmet:v:37:y:2026:i:2:n:e70080
    DOI: 10.1002/env.70080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/env.70080
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/env.70080?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rasmus Plenge Waagepetersen, 2007. "An Estimating Function Approach to Inference for Inhomogeneous Neyman–Scott Processes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(1), pages 252-258, March.
    2. Patrícia Peres Araripe & Idemauro Antonio Rodrigues de Lara & Gabriel Rodrigues Palma & Niamh Cahill & Rafael de Andrade Moral, 2025. "Diagnostics for categorical response models based on quantile residuals and distance measures," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(2), pages 306-328, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alese Wooditch, 2023. "The Benefits of Patrol Officers Using Unallocated Time for Everyday Crime Prevention," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 161-185, March.
    2. Yongtao Guan & Hansheng Wang, 2010. "Sufficient dimension reduction for spatial point processes directed by Gaussian random fields," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 72(3), pages 367-387, June.
    3. Coeurjolly, Jean-François & Reynaud-Bouret, Patricia, 2019. "A concentration inequality for inhomogeneous Neyman–Scott point processes," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 30-34.
    4. Diego Giuliani & Giuseppe Arbia & Giuseppe Espa, 2014. "Weighting Ripley’s K-Function to Account for the Firm Dimension in the Analysis of Spatial Concentration," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 37(3), pages 251-272, July.
    5. Davidson, Marty, 2024. "Strategic Point Processes," OSF Preprints g5r9t, Center for Open Science.
    6. Jesper Møller & Heidi S. Christensen & Francisco Cuevas-Pacheco & Andreas D. Christoffersen, 2021. "Structured Space-Sphere Point Processes and K-Functions," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 569-591, June.
    7. Michaela Prokešová & Jiří Dvořák & Eva B. Vedel Jensen, 2017. "Two-step estimation procedures for inhomogeneous shot-noise Cox processes," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 69(3), pages 513-542, June.
    8. Mat'uv{s} Maciak & Ostap Okhrin & Michal Pev{s}ta, 2019. "Infinitely Stochastic Micro Forecasting," Papers 1908.10636, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2019.
    9. Jieying Jiao & Guanyu Hu & Jun Yan, 2021. "Heterogeneity pursuit for spatial point pattern with application to tree locations: A Bayesian semiparametric recourse," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(7), November.
    10. Daniel, Jeffrey & Horrocks, Julie & Umphrey, Gary J., 2018. "Penalized composite likelihoods for inhomogeneous Gibbs point process models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 104-116.
    11. repec:osf:osfxxx:g5r9t_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Frédéric Lavancier & Arnaud Poinas & Rasmus Waagepetersen, 2021. "Adaptive estimating function inference for nonstationary determinantal point processes," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(1), pages 87-107, March.
    13. Chong Deng & Yongtao Guan & Rasmus P. Waagepetersen & Jingfei Zhang, 2017. "Second‐order quasi‐likelihood for spatial point processes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(4), pages 1311-1320, December.
    14. Nicoletta D’Angelo & Marianna Siino & Antonino D’Alessandro & Giada Adelfio, 2022. "Local spatial log-Gaussian Cox processes for seismic data," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 106(4), pages 633-671, December.
    15. Yolanda Caballero & Ramón Giraldo & Jorge Mateu, 2022. "A spatial randomness test based on the box-counting dimension," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 106(3), pages 499-524, September.
    16. Jalilian, Abdollah, 2016. "On the higher order product density functions of a Neyman–Scott cluster point process," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 144-150.
    17. Yongtao Guan, 2008. "Variance estimation for statistics computed from inhomogeneous spatial point processes," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(1), pages 175-190, February.
    18. R. Benedetti & F. Piersimoni & P. Postiglione, 2017. "Alternative and complementary approaches to spatially balanced samples," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 75(3), pages 249-264, December.
    19. Ji Meng Loh & Woncheol Jang, 2010. "Estimating a cosmological mass bias parameter with bootstrap bandwidth selection," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(5), pages 761-779, November.
    20. Deng, C. & Waagepetersen, R.P. & Wang, M. & Guan, Y., 2018. "A fast spectral quasi-likelihood approach for spatial point processes," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 59-64.
    21. Choiruddin, Achmad & González, Jonatan A. & Mateu, Jorge & Fadlurohman, Alwan & Waagepetersen, Rasmus, 2025. "Variable selection for spatio-temporal conditionally Poisson point processes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:envmet:v:37:y:2026:i:2:n:e70080. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1180-4009/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.