Author
Listed:
- Arnoldus F. Otto
- Antonio Punzo
- Johannes T. Ferreira
- Andriëtte Bekker
- Salvatore D. Tomarchio
- Cristina Tortora
Abstract
Bounded count data are commonly encountered in environmental studies. This paper examines two environmental applications illustrating their relevance. The first investigates the effect of winter malnutrition on mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) fawn mortality. The second application analyzes public perceptions of environmental issues using data from the Eurobarometer 95.1 survey (March–April 2021), which includes a question rating the perceived severity of climate change on a scale from 1 to 10. Together, these studies demonstrate the need for flexible bounded count models in environmental research. In this context, the binomial and beta‐binomial (BB) models are widely used for bounded count data, with the BB model offering the advantage of accounting for overdispersion. However, atypical observations in real‐world applications may hinder the performance of the BB model and lead to biased or misleading inferences. To address this limitation, we propose the contaminated beta‐binomial (cBB) distribution (cBB‐D), which introduces an additional BB component to accommodate atypical observations while preserving the mean and variance structure of the BB model. The cBB‐D thus captures both overdispersion and contamination effects in bounded count data. To incorporate explanatory variables, we further develop the contaminated BB regression model (cBB‐RM), in which none, some, or all cBB parameters may depend on covariates. The proposed models are applied to two environmental datasets, complemented by a sensitivity analysis on simulated data to assess the influence of atypical observations on parameter estimation. The methodology is implemented in the open‐source cBB package for R, available at https://github.com/arnootto/cBB.
Suggested Citation
Arnoldus F. Otto & Antonio Punzo & Johannes T. Ferreira & Andriëtte Bekker & Salvatore D. Tomarchio & Cristina Tortora, 2026.
"Modeling Bounded Count Environmental Data Using a Contaminated Beta‐Binomial Regression Model,"
Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(1), January.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:envmet:v:37:y:2026:i:1:n:e70067
DOI: 10.1002/env.70067
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:envmet:v:37:y:2026:i:1:n:e70067. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1180-4009/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.