IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/envmet/v36y2025i6ne70032.html

How Many Eggs Are Too Many? Utilizing an Under‐Dispersed Count Data Model to Gain Insights Into Evolutionary Productivity Constraints on Bird Species

Author

Listed:
  • James A. Clarke
  • Jeremy A. Smith
  • Ellie Leech
  • Philipp H. Boersch‐Supan
  • Robert A. Robinson

Abstract

Changes in productivity are primary mechanisms via which bird populations change and understanding how these processes operate is key to monitoring their populations in a changing environment. A major component of productivity is fecundity, the number of propagules produced, which for birds is the number of eggs laid (clutch size) and chicks that hatch from these (brood size). There are evolutionary constraints on the size of these fecundity measures and, therefore, variation tends to be smaller than other forms of count data. Using data on clutch and brood sizes for 55 and 52 UK bird species respectively we show these are consistently under‐dispersed with respect to the standard Poisson model, which is often used to fit such data. A three‐parameter exponentially weighted Poisson (EWP3) model fits substantively better than either a Poisson or under‐dispersed variants. We provide an R package to enable easy fitting of such models. The EWP3 is characterized by two dispersion parameters, β1$$ {\beta}_1 $$ and β2$$ {\beta}_2 $$, and we suggest that these can quantify evolutionary constraints on incubation. We show that β2$$ {\beta}_2 $$ is generally greater than β1$$ {\beta}_1 $$, indicating a greater compression at the right hand end of the distribution. This suggests that the cost of having an extra egg or chick is higher than the cost of having one too few. Although we consider avian reproduction this method should be suitable for any species which has a small number of offspring in each reproductive event.

Suggested Citation

  • James A. Clarke & Jeremy A. Smith & Ellie Leech & Philipp H. Boersch‐Supan & Robert A. Robinson, 2025. "How Many Eggs Are Too Many? Utilizing an Under‐Dispersed Count Data Model to Gain Insights Into Evolutionary Productivity Constraints on Bird Species," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(6), September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:envmet:v:36:y:2025:i:6:n:e70032
    DOI: 10.1002/env.70032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/env.70032
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/env.70032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernt-Erik Sæther & Vidar Grøtan & Steinar Engen & Tim Coulson & Peter R. Grant & Marcel E. Visser & Jon E. Brommer & B. Rosemary Grant & Lars Gustafsson & Ben J. Hatchwell & Kurt Jerstad & Patrik Kar, 2016. "Demographic routes to variability and regulation in bird populations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, November.
    2. Etterson, Matthew A. & Ellis-Felege, Susan N. & Evers, David & Gauthier, Gilles & Grzybowski, Joseph A. & Mattsson, Brady J. & Nagy, Laura R. & Olsen, Brian J. & Pease, Craig M. & van der Burg, Max Po, 2011. "Modeling fecundity in birds: Conceptual overview, current models, and considerations for future developments," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2178-2190.
    3. Nater, Chloé Rebecca & Burgess, Malcolm D. & Coffey, Peter & Harris, Bob & Lander, Frank & Price, David & Reed, Mike & Robinson, Rob, 2022. "Multi-population analysis reveals spatial consistency in drivers of population dynamics of a declining migratory bird," EcoEvoRxiv 5ru9f, Center for Open Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcot, Bruce G. & Schumaker, Nathan H. & D'Elia, Jesse, 2025. "Response of California condor populations to reintroductions, reinforcements, and reductions in spent lead ammunition pollution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 501(C).
    2. Engen, Steinar & Sæther, Bernt-Erik, 2019. "Ecological dynamics and large scale phenotypic differentiation in density-dependent populations," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 133-143.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:envmet:v:36:y:2025:i:6:n:e70032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1180-4009/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.