IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/envmet/v35y2024i6ne2874.html

Exact optimisation of spatiotemporal monitoring networks by p‐splines with applications in groundwater assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Marnie I. Low
  • Adrian W. Bowman
  • Wayne Jones
  • Matthijs Bonte

Abstract

This paper develops methods to optimise the sampling strategy for monitoring networks which have fixed locations with regular sampling but with only a proportion of these locations to be used on each sampling occasion. This creates the need for a dynamic spatiotemporal sampling design which makes optimal choices of the locations to be sampled on each occasion. This is a commonly occurring scenario in many environmental settings where there is an existing network of monitoring stations and sampling can be expensive. The particular context of optimisation of an existing groundwater monitoring network is discussed in the paper. The standard design criteria of integrated variance (IV) and variance of the integral (VI) are adapted to the spatiotemporal setting. p‐spline models are shown to allow exact computation of IV and VI, in the case of the additive errors, and a very good approximation of IV in the case of multiplicative errors. The speed of these exact computations allows the globally optimal sampling design to be identified efficiently. In the standard case of additive errors, the design criteria are able to exploit information across time. The only information needed is the location of sampling points, not the values sampled. This contrasts with the case of multiplicative errors where the design criteria are also influenced by the observed response data. Simulated and real examples are used to illustrate the results throughout.

Suggested Citation

  • Marnie I. Low & Adrian W. Bowman & Wayne Jones & Matthijs Bonte, 2024. "Exact optimisation of spatiotemporal monitoring networks by p‐splines with applications in groundwater assessment," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(6), September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:envmet:v:35:y:2024:i:6:n:e2874
    DOI: 10.1002/env.2874
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/env.2874
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/env.2874?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Diggle & Søren Lophaven, 2006. "Bayesian Geostatistical Design," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 33(1), pages 53-64, March.
    2. Martha Bohorquez & Ramon Giraldo & Jorge Mateu, 2016. "Optimal dynamic spatial sampling," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(5), pages 293-305, August.
    3. L. Evers & D. A. Molinari & A. W. Bowman & W. R. Jones & M. J. Spence, 2015. "Efficient and automatic methods for flexible regression on spatiotemporal data, with applications to groundwater monitoring," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(6), pages 431-441, September.
    4. Sreenivasulu Chadalavada & Bithin Datta, 2008. "Dynamic Optimal Monitoring Network Design for Transient Transport of Pollutants in Groundwater Aquifers," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 22(6), pages 651-670, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. K. Shuvo Bakar & Nicholas Biddle & Philip Kokic & Huidong Jin, 2020. "A Bayesian spatial categorical model for prediction to overlapping geographical areas in sample surveys," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(2), pages 535-563, February.
    2. Hedi Mahmoudpour & Somaye Janatrostami & Afshin Ashrafzadeh, 2023. "Optimal Design of Groundwater Quality Monitoring Network Using Aquifer Vulnerability Map," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(2), pages 797-818, January.
    3. Bithin Datta & Dibakar Chakrabarty & Anirban Dhar, 2009. "Optimal Dynamic Monitoring Network Design and Identification of Unknown Groundwater Pollution Sources," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(10), pages 2031-2049, August.
    4. Victor De Oliveira & Zifei Han, 2022. "On Information About Covariance Parameters in Gaussian Matérn Random Fields," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(4), pages 690-712, December.
    5. Veronique Dermauw & Ellen Van De Vijver & Pierre Dorny & Emanuele Giorgi & Rasmané Ganaba & Athanase Millogo & Zékiba Tarnagda & Assana Kone Cissé & Hélène Carabin, 2023. "Geostatistical analysis of active human cysticercosis: Results of a large-scale study in 60 villages in Burkina Faso," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(7), pages 1-20, July.
    6. Erum Zahid & Ijaz Hussain & Gunter Spöck & Muhammad Faisal & Javid Shabbir & Nasser M. AbdEl-Salam & Tajammal Hussain, 2016. "Spatial Prediction and Optimized Sampling Design for Sodium Concentration in Groundwater," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Hartman, Linda & Hossjer, Ola, 2008. "Fast kriging of large data sets with Gaussian Markov random fields," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 2331-2349, January.
    8. Borgoni, Riccardo & Radaelli, Luigi & Tritto, Valeria & Zappa, Diego, 2013. "Optimal reduction of a spatial monitoring grid: Proposals and applications in process control," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 407-419.
    9. Manish Jha & Bithin Datta, 2014. "Linked Simulation-Optimization based Dedicated Monitoring Network Design for Unknown Pollutant Source Identification using Dynamic Time Warping Distance," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(12), pages 4161-4182, September.
    10. L. Raso & S. V. Weijs & M. Werner, 2018. "Balancing Costs and Benefits in Selecting New Information: Efficient Monitoring Using Deterministic Hydro-economic Models," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(1), pages 339-357, January.
    11. Eidsvik, Jo & Finley, Andrew O. & Banerjee, Sudipto & Rue, Håvard, 2012. "Approximate Bayesian inference for large spatial datasets using predictive process models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 1362-1380.
    12. Letícia Ellen Dal Canton & Luciana Pagliosa Carvalho Guedes & Miguel Angel Uribe-Opazo, 2021. "Reduction of Sample Size in the Soil Physical-Chemical Attributes Using the Multivariate Effective Sample Size," Journal of Agricultural Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(1), pages 357-376, June.
    13. Jacopo Paglia & Jo Eidsvik & Juha Karvanen, 2022. "Efficient spatial designs using Hausdorff distances and Bayesian optimization," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(3), pages 1060-1084, September.
    14. Earl W Duncan & Kerrie L Mengersen, 2020. "Comparing Bayesian spatial models: Goodness-of-smoothing criteria for assessing under- and over-smoothing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-28, May.
    15. Finley, Andrew O. & Sang, Huiyan & Banerjee, Sudipto & Gelfand, Alan E., 2009. "Improving the performance of predictive process modeling for large datasets," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 2873-2884, June.
    16. Sudipto Banerjee & Alan E. Gelfand & Andrew O. Finley & Huiyan Sang, 2008. "Gaussian predictive process models for large spatial data sets," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(4), pages 825-848, September.
    17. Baalousha, Husam, 2010. "Assessment of a groundwater quality monitoring network using vulnerability mapping and geostatistics: A case study from Heretaunga Plains, New Zealand," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 240-246, February.
    18. Bithin Datta & Om Prakash & Sean Campbell & Gerry Escalada, 2013. "Efficient Identification of Unknown Groundwater Pollution Sources Using Linked Simulation-Optimization Incorporating Monitoring Location Impact Factor and Frequency Factor," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(14), pages 4959-4976, November.
    19. Qian Ren & Sudipto Banerjee, 2013. "Hierarchical Factor Models for Large Spatially Misaligned Data: A Low-Rank Predictive Process Approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(1), pages 19-30, March.
    20. Arbia, Giuseppe & Lafratta, Giovanni & Simeoni, Carla, 2007. "Spatial sampling plans to monitor the 3-D spatial distribution of extremes in soil pollution surveys," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(8), pages 4069-4082, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:envmet:v:35:y:2024:i:6:n:e2874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1180-4009/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.