IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/envmet/v31y2020i3ne2607.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Goodness‐of‐fit tests for βARMA hydrological time series modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Vinícius T. Scher
  • Francisco Cribari‐Neto
  • Guilherme Pumi
  • Fábio M. Bayer

Abstract

We address the issue of performing portmanteau testing inference using time series data that assume values in the standard unit interval. The motivation involves modeling the time series dynamics of the proportion of stocked hydroelectric energy in the South of Brazil. Our focus lies in the class of beta autoregressive moving average (βARMA) models. In particular, we wish to test the goodness‐of‐fit of such models. We consider several testing criteria that have been proposed for Gaussian time series models and introduce two new tests. We derive the asymptotic null distribution of the two proposed test statistics in two different scenarios, namely, when the tests are applied to an observed time series and when they are applied to the residuals from a fitted βARMA model. It is worth noticing that our results imply the asymptotic validity of standard portmanteau tests in the class of βARMA models that are, under the null hypothesis, asymptotically equivalent to our test statistics. We use Monte Carlo simulation to assess the relative merits of the different portmanteau tests when used with fitted βARMA models. The simulation results we present show that the new tests are typically more powerful than a well‐known test whose test statistic is also based on residual partial autocorrelations. Overall, the tests we propose perform quite well. Finally, we model the dynamics of the proportion of stocked hydroelectric energy in Brazil. The results show that the βARMA model outperforms three alternative models and an exponential smoothing algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • Vinícius T. Scher & Francisco Cribari‐Neto & Guilherme Pumi & Fábio M. Bayer, 2020. "Goodness‐of‐fit tests for βARMA hydrological time series modeling," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:envmet:v:31:y:2020:i:3:n:e2607
    DOI: 10.1002/env.2607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/env.2607
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/env.2607?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cribari-Neto, Francisco & Scher, Vinícius T. & Bayer, Fábio M., 2023. "Beta autoregressive moving average model selection with application to modeling and forecasting stored hydroelectric energy," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 98-109.
    2. Melchior, Cristiane & Zanini, Roselaine Ruviaro & Guerra, Renata Rojas & Rockenbach, Dinei A., 2021. "Forecasting Brazilian mortality rates due to occupational accidents using autoregressive moving average approaches," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 825-837.
    3. Alice B. V. Mello & Maria C. S. Lima & Abraão D. C. Nascimento, 2022. "A notable Gamma‐Lindley first‐order autoregressive process: An application to hydrological data," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(4), June.
    4. Palm, Bruna G. & Bayer, Fábio M. & Cintra, Renato J., 2022. "2-D Rayleigh autoregressive moving average model for SAR image modeling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    5. Abraão D. C. Nascimento & Maria C. S. Lima & Hassan Bakouch & Najla Qarmalah, 2023. "Scaled Muth–ARMA Process Applied to Finance Market," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Tingguo Zheng & Han Xiao & Rong Chen, 2022. "Generalized autoregressive moving average models with GARCH errors," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 125-146, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:envmet:v:31:y:2020:i:3:n:e2607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1180-4009/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.