IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/empleg/v8y2011i1p85-117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Victim‐Based Effects on Racially Disparate Sentencing in Ohio

Author

Listed:
  • John Wooldredge
  • Timothy Griffin
  • Amy Thistlethwaite
  • Fritz Rauschenberg

Abstract

Scholars have argued that African‐American men accused of violently victimizing whites receive especially harsh treatment in court. This thesis was tested with samples of felony defendants processed in Ohio courts before and after the implementation of sentencing guidelines. During the preguideline period only, African‐American men accused of victimizing whites were less likely than other defendants to plead guilty in exchange for reduced charges and/or sentences, and African‐American men incarcerated for violent crimes against whites received longer sentences than other incarcerated offenders. During the postguideline period only, by contrast, the odds of pleading guilty in exchange for reduced charges were actually higher for African‐American men accused of victimizing whites. African‐American male prison terms significantly declined relative to incarcerated whites from the preguideline to the postguideline period. The interaction effect of defendant‐victim race was significant during the preguideline period, not significant in the postguideline period, and significantly changed over time.

Suggested Citation

  • John Wooldredge & Timothy Griffin & Amy Thistlethwaite & Fritz Rauschenberg, 2011. "Victim‐Based Effects on Racially Disparate Sentencing in Ohio," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 85-117, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:empleg:v:8:y:2011:i:1:p:85-117
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01202.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01202.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01202.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:empleg:v:8:y:2011:i:1:p:85-117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1740-1461 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.