IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/empleg/v3y2006i2p297-331.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Use of Foreign Decisions by Federal Courts: An Empirical Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • David Zaring

Abstract

This article adds an empirical perspective to the debate over the use of foreign authority by federal courts. It surveys 60 years of federal court practice in citing opinions from foreign high courts using a citation count analysis. The data reveal that federal courts rarely cite to foreign decisions, they do so no more now than they did in the past, and on those few occasions where they do cite to foreign decisions, it's usually not to help them interpret domestic law. Instead, the citation of foreign decisions is best understood as a relatively rare phenomenon of judicial dialogue in cases where international issues are squarely presented by the facts. The article examines those few cases where federal courts have cited foreign decisions in some detail, and briefly considers some implications of the limited use of foreign decisions by federal courts.

Suggested Citation

  • David Zaring, 2006. "The Use of Foreign Decisions by Federal Courts: An Empirical Analysis," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(2), pages 297-331, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:empleg:v:3:y:2006:i:2:p:297-331
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2006.00071.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2006.00071.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2006.00071.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Erik Voeten, 2010. "Borrowing and Nonborrowing among International Courts," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 39(2), pages 547-576.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:empleg:v:3:y:2006:i:2:p:297-331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1740-1461 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.