IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/empleg/v22y2025i4p403-413.html

Measuring the Value of Trademark Distinctiveness: Evidence From the Market for Bordeaux Wine

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Buccafusco
  • Jonathan S. Masur
  • Ryan Whalen

Abstract

The market value of distinctive trademarks is a fundamental assumption of both trademark law and marketing theory. However, there is little empirical evidence underlying this assumption. We examine the relationship between brand dissimilarity and market prices in the context of the Bordeaux wine market. Using a unique dataset covering thousands of wines and their associated prices and professional ratings, we find that brand distinctiveness is related to higher wine prices. We further show that this relationship persists across the wine quality spectrum, with both lower quality and higher quality wines benefiting from dissimilar marks. Finally, we show that while there is a dissimilarity price premium for lower quality wines, producers who invest in higher quality wines are rewarded with an even greater premium for dissimilar names in absolute dollar terms.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Buccafusco & Jonathan S. Masur & Ryan Whalen, 2025. "Measuring the Value of Trademark Distinctiveness: Evidence From the Market for Bordeaux Wine," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 403-413, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:empleg:v:22:y:2025:i:4:p:403-413
    DOI: 10.1111/jels.70002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.70002
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jels.70002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:empleg:v:22:y:2025:i:4:p:403-413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1740-1461 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.