IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/empleg/v12y2015i4p664-685.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interparty Judicial Appointments

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Remy Nash

Abstract

Empirical studies of judges’ ideological voting call for a theory according to which the ideology of the judges can be measured. This article calls into question the assumption that undergirds the measure that currently dominates the legal, economic, and political science literature—the assumption that the ideology of a lower federal court judge is largely predicted by the ideologies of the nominating president and the relevant state's senators who are of the same political party as the president. The article relies on a natural experiment to examine this question empirically. Between 1977 and 1998, New York was represented in the Senate by one Democrat and one Republican who had an agreement to divide appointments to the district courts in the state: the senator who shared party affiliation with the president would be allocated three of every four appointments, while the “out‐of‐party” senator would be allocated the rest. The article employs a novel data set—consisting of all federal district judges appointed to the federal bench in New York during the time period in question, and the senator who recommended each nominee to the nominating president. If the dominant theory—that the party of the recommending senator affects judicial decision making—holds, then one would expect the theory's explanatory power to be at its apex where senators of different parties recommend judges at the same time to the same president. Yet, using median prison sentence length as a proxy for ideology in decision making, the empirical analysis finds no evidence that senatorial ideology has a statistically significant effect on district judge decision making. At the same time, it finds that, indeed, the nominating president's ideology does have a statistically significant effect. The findings are instead consistent with the minority view of lower federal court judges’ ideological leanings—that a lower federal court judge's ideology is in large part a function solely of the nominating president's ideology.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Remy Nash, 2015. "Interparty Judicial Appointments," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(4), pages 664-685, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:empleg:v:12:y:2015:i:4:p:664-685
    DOI: 10.1111/jels.12088
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12088
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jels.12088?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:empleg:v:12:y:2015:i:4:p:664-685. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1740-1461 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.