IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/emjrnl/v19y2016i1p55-83.html

Nonparametric bootstrap tests for independence of generalized errors

Author

Listed:
  • Zaichao Du

Abstract

In this paper, we develop a general method of testing for independence when unobservable generalized errors are involved. Our method can be applied to testing for serial independence of generalized errors, and testing for independence between the generalized errors and observable covariates. The former can serve as a unified approach to testing the adequacy of time series models, as model adequacy often implies that the generalized errors obtained after a suitable transformation are independent and identically distributed. The latter is a key identification assumption in many nonlinear economic models. Our tests are based on a classical sample dependence measure, the Hoeffding–Blum–Kiefer–Rosenblatt‐type empirical process applied to generalized residuals. We establish a uniform expansion of the process, thereby deriving an explicit expression for the parameter estimation effect, which causes our tests not to be nuisance‐parameter‐free. To circumvent this problem, we propose a multiplier‐type bootstrap to approximate the limit distribution. Our bootstrap procedure is computationally very simple as it does not require a re‐estimation of the parameters in each bootstrap replication. Simulations and empirical applications to daily exchange rate data highlight the merits of our approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Zaichao Du, 2016. "Nonparametric bootstrap tests for independence of generalized errors," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 19(1), pages 55-83, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:emjrnl:v:19:y:2016:i:1:p:55-83
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/ectj.12059
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zaichao Du & Juan Carlos Escanciano, 2017. "Backtesting Expected Shortfall: Accounting for Tail Risk," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(4), pages 940-958, April.
    2. Nasri, Bouchra R. & Rémillard, Bruno N. & Bahraoui, Tarik, 2022. "Change-point problems for multivariate time series using pseudo-observations," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    3. Nasri, Bouchra R., 2022. "Tests of serial dependence for multivariate time series with arbitrary distributions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    4. Kilani Ghoudi & Bruno Rémillard, 2018. "Serial independence tests for innovations of conditional mean and variance models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 27(1), pages 3-26, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:emjrnl:v:19:y:2016:i:1:p:55-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.