IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/ectrin/v34y2026i4p741-759.html

Improvement in Communal Property Rights, Collateralisability and Agriculture Productivity

Author

Listed:
  • Chengrui Xiao
  • Shuping Qiu
  • Bo Zhou

Abstract

Communal land tenure, which only grants partial property rights to farm operators, is adopted in many countries. Communal property rights thereby have a limited collateralizability to support credit transactions and thus can impede productivity. This paper provides an insight into how agricultural productivity responds to an improvement in property rights of communal land, that is, the endorsement of collateralizability. We exploited the farmland operational right (FOR) pilot reform in China in 2015, which allows operational rights of communal farmland to be utilised as collateral to obtain loans from banks. The findings suggest that the agricultural productivity was significantly increased by around 2 percent in pilot counties. The increased agricultural productivity appears to be associated with enhanced access to credit and improved transferability of communal farmland. Our analysis further reveals that local governments with stable fiscal sustainability and close connections to the provincial governments benefited greatly from the FOR pilot reform with respect to agricultural productivity. China provides an institutional innovation of lifting restrictions on communal property rights without fundamentally altering land ownership to other countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Chengrui Xiao & Shuping Qiu & Bo Zhou, 2026. "Improvement in Communal Property Rights, Collateralisability and Agriculture Productivity," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(4), pages 741-759, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:ectrin:v:34:y:2026:i:4:p:741-759
    DOI: 10.1111/ecot.70038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.70038
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ecot.70038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:ectrin:v:34:y:2026:i:4:p:741-759. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)2577-6983 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.