IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/ectrin/v34y2026i2p321-338.html

Trade Liberalisation and the Gender Wage Gap: Evidence From Pilot Free Trade Zones Policy Reform in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xinxin Ma

Abstract

Using national longitudinal survey data from the China Family Panel Studies spanning 2010 to 2018, this study conducts a quasi‐natural experiment based on the pilot free trade zones (PFTZ) policy reform in China. The study examines the causal relationship between trade liberalisation and the gender wage gap (GWG) using a staggered difference‐in‐differences approach. Four conclusions emerge. First, the PFTZ policy increases wages for both men and women. However, the effect is larger for men than for women, suggesting that PFTZ policy expand the GWG. Second, the PFTZ policy's effect on wages is larger for the medium‐ than low‐ or high‐wage groups. Third, the gender difference in the FTZ wage premium expands the overall GWG, whereas the gender disparity in the labour force allocation between FTZs and non‐FTZs reduces the GWG. Finally, the gender difference in the FTZ wage premium expands the GWG in the low‐, middle‐ and high‐wage groups, and this effect is much more pronounced in the high‐wage group. The gender disparity in the labour force allocation reduces the GWG in the medium‐wage group, whereas it widens the GWG in the low‐ and high‐wage groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinxin Ma, 2026. "Trade Liberalisation and the Gender Wage Gap: Evidence From Pilot Free Trade Zones Policy Reform in China," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 321-338, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:ectrin:v:34:y:2026:i:2:p:321-338
    DOI: 10.1111/ecot.70015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.70015
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ecot.70015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:ectrin:v:34:y:2026:i:2:p:321-338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)2577-6983 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.