IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/complx/v2025y2025i1n6858524.html

Deep Recognition of Public Opinion Reversals in Critical Incidents Based on Hypernetwork Architecture

Author

Listed:
  • Xuna Wang
  • Lifan Zhang

Abstract

With the development of social media and online platforms, the speed of dissemination and influence of emergencies in cyberspace have increased significantly. The rapid change of public opinion, especially the reversal of public opinion, may have a significant impact on social stability and government credibility. The hypernetwork structure has complex multilevel and multidimensional characteristics, and it is of great significance to analyze the multiple participating subjects of public opinion evolution and their complex relationships based on the hypernetwork theory, and to further identify the public opinion reversal for the public opinion response and guidance of emergencies. According to the complex interaction between the participants of emergencies and internal and external factors, this paper constructs a hypernetwork model including four subnets of users, time series, opinions, and emotions, and analyzes the network structure in detail. On this basis, the method steps of emergency public opinion inversion recognition are proposed. Taking the public opinion event caused by Hongxing Erke donation during the rainstorm in Henan Province of China as an example, the empirical analysis is carried out. The research shows that the proposed emergency hypernetwork model provides effective support for the identification of public opinion inversion, and the identification method of public opinion inversion based on the hypernetwork is helpful to find the trend of public opinion evolution, so as to infer the tendency of public opinion inversion, which provides new ideas for the related research of public opinion monitoring and emergency response.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuna Wang & Lifan Zhang, 2025. "Deep Recognition of Public Opinion Reversals in Critical Incidents Based on Hypernetwork Architecture," Complexity, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2025(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:complx:v:2025:y:2025:i:1:n:6858524
    DOI: 10.1155/cplx/6858524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/cplx/6858524
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/cplx/6858524?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shan Gao & Ye Zhang & Wenhui Liu, 2021. "How Does Risk-Information Communication Affect the Rebound of Online Public Opinion of Public Emergencies in China?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-14, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuzhou Hou & Xuanhua Xu & Zongrun Wang & Weiwei Zhang, 2025. "A human-machine collaborative dynamic group consensus mechanism for mitigating manipulative tendencies," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Chao Zhang & Ning Ma & Guohui Sun, 2022. "Using Grounded Theory to Identify Online Public Opinion in China to Improve Risk Management—The Case of COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Yifan Wu & Fan Zhang & Albert P. C. Chan & Dezhi Li, 2025. "Sentiment Evolution of Online Public Opinion of Emergency Situations in Railway Stations: A Case Study of Wuhan Railway Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-29, January.
    4. Yu Lei & Guirong Zhang & Shan Lu & Jiahuan Qian, 2022. "Generation Paths of Major Road Accidents Based on Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-15, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:complx:v:2025:y:2025:i:1:n:6858524. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/8503 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.