IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/complx/v2022y2022i1n9367638.html

[Retracted] A Comparison of Finite Difference and Finite Volume Methods with Numerical Simulations: Burgers Equation Model

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Hasan Ali
  • Ahmed Shawki Jaber
  • Mustafa T. Yaseen
  • Mohammed Rasheed
  • Omer Bazighifan
  • Taher A. Nofal

Abstract

In this paper, we present an intensive investigation of the finite volume method (FVM) compared to the finite difference methods (FDMs). In order to show the main difference in the way of approaching the solution, we take the Burgers equation and the Buckley–Leverett equation as examples to simulate the previously mentioned methods. On the one hand, we simulate the results of the finite difference methods using the schemes of Lax–Friedrichs and Lax–Wendroff. On the other hand, we apply Godunov’s scheme to simulate the results of the finite volume method. Moreover, we show how starting with a variational formulation of the problem, the finite element technique provides piecewise formulations of functions defined by a collection of grid data points, while the finite difference technique begins with a differential formulation of the problem and continues to discretize the derivatives. Finally, some graphical and numerical comparisons are provided to illustrate and corroborate the differences between these two main methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Hasan Ali & Ahmed Shawki Jaber & Mustafa T. Yaseen & Mohammed Rasheed & Omer Bazighifan & Taher A. Nofal, 2022. "[Retracted] A Comparison of Finite Difference and Finite Volume Methods with Numerical Simulations: Burgers Equation Model," Complexity, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:complx:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:9367638
    DOI: 10.1155/2022/9367638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9367638
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2022/9367638?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:complx:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:9367638. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/8503 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.