IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v6y1989i1p266-268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discussion of “Trading volume theories and their implication for empirical information content studiesâ€

Author

Listed:
  • ROBERT E. VERRECCHIA

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert E. Verrecchia, 1989. "Discussion of “Trading volume theories and their implication for empirical information content studiesâ€," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(1), pages 266-268, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:6:y:1989:i:1:p:266-268
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1989.tb00757.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1989.tb00757.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1989.tb00757.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H. Jonathan Jang & Byung T. Ro, 1989. "Trading volume theories and their implications for empirical information content studies," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(1), pages 242-262, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hutson, Elaine & Kearney, Colm, 2001. "Volatility in stocks subject to takeover bids: Australian evidence using daily data," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 273-296, July.
    2. Malay K. Dey & Chaoyan Wang, 2021. "Volume decomposition and volatility in dual-listing H-shares," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(4), pages 301-310, July.
    3. James A. Ohlson, 1989. "Discussion of “trading volume theories and their implications for empirical information content studiesâ€," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(1), pages 263-265, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:6:y:1989:i:1:p:266-268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.