IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v36y2019i2p1077-1097.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Client as a Source of Institutional Conformity for Commitments to Core Values in the Auditing Profession

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Carrington
  • Tobias Johansson
  • Gustav Johed
  • Peter Öhman

Abstract

Based on an analysis of questionnaire data from a large sample of certified auditors, we examine how the main type of client being served influences auditor conformity to the core values of their profession. We contrast auditors of (primarily) listed companies with auditors of (primarily) single member companies, that is, limited liability companies with a single owner who typically is also the only employee of the company. We show that these two groups of auditors differ in the extent to which they hold certain values important (i.e., show compliance) and in the closeness with which these values are held within each group of auditors (i.e., show convergence). Our results also demonstrate that the type of client predominantly served by an auditor is relevant for explaining variation in professional values both within and between organizational contexts. In addition, we offer a new theoretical approach to classifying auditors and analyzing their commitment to core values of the profession. We analyze commitment to values via both compliance and convergence, two often overlooked aspects of conformity to value commitments in professions. Le client, source de conformité institutionnelle aux engagements à l’égard des valeurs fondamentales de la profession d'audit En s'appuyant sur une analyse des données recueillies au moyen d'un questionnaire auprès d'un vaste échantillon d'auditeurs agréés, les auteurs se demandent comment la principale catégorie de clients des services d'audit influe sur le respect par les auditeurs des valeurs fondamentales de leur profession. Ils mettent en opposition les auditeurs dont les clients sont principalement des sociétés cotées et ceux dont les clients sont principalement des entreprises individuelles à responsabilité limitée, appartenant à un seul propriétaire qui en est d'ordinaire aussi l'unique employé. Les auteurs montrent que ces deux groupes d'auditeurs diffèrent à l’égard de l'importance qu'ils accordent à certaines valeurs (degré d'adhésion) et de la rigueur avec laquelle ils concourent au respect de ces valeurs (degré de convergence). Les résultats qu'ils obtiennent révèlent que la principale catégorie de clients des auditeurs contribue à expliquer la variabilité des valeurs professionnelles qu'ils portent, tant dans un même milieu organisationnel qu'entre différents milieux organisationnels. Les auteurs proposent, de plus, un nouveau schéma théorique de classification des auditeurs et d'analyse de leur engagement à l’égard des valeurs fondamentales de la profession. Ils évaluent cet engagement en termes d'adhésion et de convergence, deux aspects souvent négligés de la solidité dudit engagement à l’égard des valeurs professionnelles.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Carrington & Tobias Johansson & Gustav Johed & Peter Öhman, 2019. "The Client as a Source of Institutional Conformity for Commitments to Core Values in the Auditing Profession," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 1077-1097, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:36:y:2019:i:2:p:1077-1097
    DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12456
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1911-3846.12456?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maureen Gelle-Jimenez & Hector M. Aguiling, 2021. "Leveraging human resources management (HRM) practices toward congruence of values," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(1), pages 85-94, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:36:y:2019:i:2:p:1077-1097. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.