Author
Listed:
- Michael DeDad
- Sucharita Ghosh
Abstract
This paper meticulously investigates how the US‐China trade war of 2018–19 affected nondurable consumption patterns for households across the United States. Using highly granular NielsenIQ barcode scanner data, we find that a 1 percentage point (pp) increase in a county's tariff exposure growth was associated with a decrease in nondurable consumption growth ranging between 0.593 pp and 2.163 pp. Notably, this relationship existed for employed households but not for those without employment, and it was not confined to those working in manufacturing and farming. Additionally, households with children had lower consumption growth as tariff exposure increased, and the relationship was more negative for larger households. Regionally, Midwest households were more negatively affected than those in the New England, Pacific, and South Atlantic states. The relationship between household consumption growth and tariff exposure growth was similar for both more‐ and less‐durable goods. These findings have significant implications for understanding the economic and social impacts of trade wars on household consumption patterns. Guerre commerciale entre les États‐Unis et la Chine : effets hétérogènes sur le consommateur américain. Cet article examine méticuleusement les effets de la guerre commerciale entre les États‐Unis et la Chine (2018‐2019) sur les habitudes de consommation de biens non durables des ménages américains. À partir de données très détaillées issues du système de codes‐barres de NielsenIQ, nous constatons qu'une augmentation d'un point de pourcentage de la croissance de l'exposition tarifaire d'un comté est associée à une baisse de la croissance de la consommation de biens non durables comprise entre 0,593 et 2,163 points de pourcentage. Ce lien est observé chez les ménages ayant un emploi, mais pas chez ceux sans emploi, et il ne se limite pas aux personnes travaillant dans les secteurs manufacturier ou agricole. Par ailleurs, les ménages avec enfants présentent une croissance de la consommation plus faible à mesure que l'exposition tarifaire augmente, et cette relation est d'autant plus négative que le ménage est de grande taille. Sur le plan régional, les ménages du Midwest ont été plus durement touchés que ceux de la Nouvelle‐Angleterre, de la côte pacifique et des États du sud de la côte atlantique. La relation entre la croissance de la consommation des ménages et celle de l'exposition tarifaire est semblable pour les biens plus ou moins durables. Ces résultats contribuent à mieux comprendre les effets économiques et sociaux des guerres commerciales sur les comportements de consommation des ménages.
Suggested Citation
Michael DeDad & Sucharita Ghosh, 2026.
"US‐China trade war: Heterogeneous effects on the US consumer,"
Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(1), pages 333-362, February.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:canjec:v:59:y:2026:i:1:p:333-362
DOI: 10.1111/caje.70045
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:canjec:v:59:y:2026:i:1:p:333-362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1540-5982 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.