IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/camsys/v21y2025i4ne70065.html

PROTOCOL: Strategies to Enhance Inclusion in Informed Consent Practice for People With Vision and/or Hearing Support Needs: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Fleur O'Hare
  • Sujani Thrimawithana
  • Aimee Clague
  • Eden G. Robertson
  • David Foran
  • Caroline Ondracek
  • Camille Paynter
  • Tessa Saunders
  • Lauren N. Ayton

Abstract

An equitable and accessible informed consent process is needed to support agency and mutual decision‐making. This systematic review aims to gather and characterise the evidence supporting methods that enhance inclusion and accessibility in informed consent practice for people with vision and/or hearing support needs. It will address the research question: what strategies are being used to enhance inclusive consent practice for people with vision impairment, people who are d/Deaf or hard of hearing, and people who are d/Deafblind. Additionally, the review aims to generate recommendations to facilitate the uptake of accessibility practices within informed consent procedures. This systematic review will build on current evidence for the positive impact of intentional actions to support accessible communication and information exchange. It may guide future work on intervention development and primary research in improving equity in clinical care and research.

Suggested Citation

  • Fleur O'Hare & Sujani Thrimawithana & Aimee Clague & Eden G. Robertson & David Foran & Caroline Ondracek & Camille Paynter & Tessa Saunders & Lauren N. Ayton, 2025. "PROTOCOL: Strategies to Enhance Inclusion in Informed Consent Practice for People With Vision and/or Hearing Support Needs: A Systematic Review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(4), December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:21:y:2025:i:4:n:e70065
    DOI: 10.1002/cl2.70065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.70065
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/cl2.70065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:21:y:2025:i:4:n:e70065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1891-1803 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.