IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/camsys/v21y2025i2ne70044.html

PROTOCOL: The Application of Information and Communication Technologies in Physical Activity Interventions for Breast Cancer: A Scoping Review Protocol

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Chen
  • Maaz Imam
  • Yutong Yi
  • JJ Pionke
  • Lixcy Vega
  • Anna Arthur
  • Jessie Chin
  • Chungyi Chiu

Abstract

This is the protocol of a Campbell scoping review. This scoping review aims to identify and map the evidence regarding the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in physical activity (PA) interventions for breast cancer survivors (BCS), which includes examining the types of ICTs utilized, how they are applied, and their effects on BCS' PA‐related outcomes. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews Checklist (PRISMA‐ScR) was used to structure this protocol. The focus of the scoping review is guided by the mnemonic PCC (Population, Concept, Context) recommended by the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. PubMed, CINAHL (Ebsco), Web of Science (Clarivate), and SportDiscus (Ebsco) will be searched for peer‐reviewed studies. We will include interventional studies using ICTs for PA promotion among BCS across the cancer care continuum. Our protocol incorporates information about the aims and importance of the scoping review, search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, study selection, data extraction, quality assessment, and data synthesis. The total number and key characteristics of included studies will be reported in this scoping review. It will identify and map the current ICTs used in PA interventions, outline the methods and extent of their application, and summarize the related outcomes observed among BCS. Participation in PA remains insufficient among BCS despite its known benefits in lowering the risk of death and improving breast cancer prognosis. While technology‐based interventions have received increased attention in recent years, there is still limited consensus within the scientific literature surrounding ICT‐based PA interventions for BCS. The use of ICTs in PA interventions may promote PA among BCS and benefit their survivorship. This scoping review may lead to strategies for developing ICTs that are optimal to be used in PA interventions that benefit BCS, a large and growing population of cancer survivors. Additionally, it will identify knowledge gaps to enhance healthcare communication between healthcare practitioners and BCS using ICTs, which may promote PA and lead to improved cancer survivorship in this population. Registered and available at OSF (https://osf.io/hwde4/?view_only=be6ef619dc1a44b080bb61be32d5d56f).

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Chen & Maaz Imam & Yutong Yi & JJ Pionke & Lixcy Vega & Anna Arthur & Jessie Chin & Chungyi Chiu, 2025. "PROTOCOL: The Application of Information and Communication Technologies in Physical Activity Interventions for Breast Cancer: A Scoping Review Protocol," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(2), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:21:y:2025:i:2:n:e70044
    DOI: 10.1002/cl2.70044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.70044
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/cl2.70044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alice Avancini & Valeria Pala & Ilaria Trestini & Daniela Tregnago & Luigi Mariani & Sabina Sieri & Vittorio Krogh & Marco Boresta & Michele Milella & Sara Pilotto & Massimo Lanza, 2020. "Exercise Levels and Preferences in Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Lidia Delrieu & Jeff Vallance & Magali Morelle & Béatrice Fervers & Vincent Pialoux & Christine M. Friedenreich & Armelle Dufresne & Thomas Bachelot & Pierre‐etienne Heudel & Olivier Trédan & Olivia P, 2020. "Physical activity preferences before and after participation in a 6‐month physical activity intervention among women with metastatic breast cancer," Post-Print hal-02464367, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alice Avancini & Carlo Ferri Marini & Isabella Sperduti & Valentina Natalucci & Anita Borsati & Sara Pilotto & Claudia Cerulli & Elena Barbieri & Francesco Lucertini & Massimo Lanza & Attilio Parisi &, 2022. "Kinesiology Students’ Perception Regarding Exercise Oncology: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-10, June.
    2. Marina Touillaud & Baptiste Fournier & Olivia Pérol & Lidia Delrieu & Aurélia Maire & Elodie Belladame & David Pérol & Lionel Perrier & Marie Preau & Tanguy Leroy & Jean-Baptiste Fassier & Florie Fill, 2023. "Connected device and therapeutic patient education to promote physical activity among women with localised breast cancer (DISCO trial): protocol for a multicentre 2×2 factorial randomised controlled trial," Post-Print halshs-03428061, HAL.
    3. Anna Lewandowska & Grzegorz Rudzki & Tomasz Lewandowski & Sławomir Rudzki, 2020. "The Problems and Needs of Patients Diagnosed with Cancer and Their Caregivers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Muluken Azage & Serkalem Zewudie & Martha H. Goedert & Engda G. Hagos, 2023. "Epidemiological Characteristics of Cancer Patients Attending at Felege Hiwot Referral Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-13, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:21:y:2025:i:2:n:e70044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1891-1803 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.