IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/apsmbi/v35y2019i3p537-551.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian planning of step‐stress accelerated degradation tests under various optimality criteria

Author

Listed:
  • Xiujie Zhao
  • Rong Pan
  • Min Xie

Abstract

Step‐stress accelerated degradation testing (SSADT) has become a common approach to predicting lifetime for highly reliable products that are unlikely to fail in a reasonable time under use conditions or even elevated stress conditions. In literature, the planning of SSADT has been widely investigated for stochastic degradation processes, such as Wiener processes and gamma processes. In this paper, we model the optimal SSADT planning problem from a Bayesian perspective and optimize test plans by determining both stress levels and the allocation of inspections. Large‐sample approximation is used to derive the asymptotic Bayesian utility functions under 3 planning criteria. A revisited LED lamp example is presented to illustrate our method. The comparison with optimal plans from previous studies demonstrates the necessity of considering the stress levels and inspection allocations simultaneously.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiujie Zhao & Rong Pan & Min Xie, 2019. "Bayesian planning of step‐stress accelerated degradation tests under various optimality criteria," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(3), pages 537-551, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:35:y:2019:i:3:p:537-551
    DOI: 10.1002/asmb.2332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.2332
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asmb.2332?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:35:y:2019:i:3:p:537-551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1526-4025 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.