IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/apsmbi/v34y2018i6p893-907.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information‐theoretic multistage sampling framework for medical audits

Author

Listed:
  • Muzaffer Musal
  • Tahir Ekin

Abstract

The sampling resource allocation decisions for medical audits of outpatient procedures are crucial and challenging because of the large payment amounts and heterogeneity of the claims. A number of frameworks are utilized to help auditors address the trade‐offs between efficiency and cost while having valid overpayment amount estimates. As a potential improvement, this paper presents a novel information‐theoretic multistage sampling framework. In particular, we propose an iterative stratified sampling method that uses Lindley's entropy measure to evaluate the expected amount of information. We use US Medicare Part B claims outpatient payment data and investigate the versatility of the framework for different overpayment scenarios and resource allocation designs. The proposed method results in reasonable coverage and lower estimation errors for the proportion of overpaid claims and overpayment recovery amounts. Our sampling method is shown to outperform the current stratification method of practice, ie, Neyman allocation, for many scenarios. The framework also can be used to make probability statements on variables of interest, such as the number of overpaid claims.

Suggested Citation

  • Muzaffer Musal & Tahir Ekin, 2018. "Information‐theoretic multistage sampling framework for medical audits," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(6), pages 893-907, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:34:y:2018:i:6:p:893-907
    DOI: 10.1002/asmb.2338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.2338
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asmb.2338?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:34:y:2018:i:6:p:893-907. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1526-4025 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.