IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/apsmbi/v34y2018i1p20-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combining binomial test data via two‐stage solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Janet Myhre
  • Daniel R. Jeske
  • Jun Li
  • Anne M. Hansen

Abstract

A commonly occurring problem in reliability testing is how to combine pass/fail test data that is collected from disparate environments. We have worked with colleagues in aerospace engineering for a number of years where two types of test environments in use are ground tests and flight tests. Ground tests are less expensive and consequently more numerous. Flight tests are much less frequent, but directly reflect the actual usage environment. We discuss a relatively simple combining approach that realizes the benefit of a larger sample size by using ground test data, but at the same time accounts for the difference between the two environments. We compare our solution with what look like more sophisticated approaches to the problem in order to calibrate its limitations. Overall, we find that our proposed solution is robust to its inherent assumptions, which explains its usefulness in practice. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Janet Myhre & Daniel R. Jeske & Jun Li & Anne M. Hansen, 2018. "Combining binomial test data via two‐stage solutions," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(1), pages 20-30, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:34:y:2018:i:1:p:20-30
    DOI: 10.1002/asmb.2255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.2255
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asmb.2255?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:34:y:2018:i:1:p:20-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1526-4025 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.