IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/apsmbi/v21y2005i4-5p289-301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The diffusion of marketing science in the practitioners' community: opening the black box

Author

Listed:
  • Albert C. Bemmaor
  • Philip Hans Franses

Abstract

This editorial discusses an illustration of the potential hindrances to the diffusion of modern methodologies in the practitioners' (i.e. the buyers of research, not the consultants) community. Taking the example of classical regression analysis based on store‐level scanner data, the authors discuss the potential limitations of the classical regression model, with the example of the occurrence of ‘wrong’ signs and of coefficients with unexpected magnitudes. In an interview with one of the authors, a (randomly picked) Senior Marketing Research Manager at a leading firm of packaged goods reports his/her experience with econometric models. To him/her, econometric models are presented as a ‘black box’ (his/her written words). In his/her experience, they provided results that were ‘quite good’ in a ‘much focused’ context only. There were experimental data obtained with a Latin square design and the analysis included a single brand with only four stock‐keeping units (SKUs). The company ‘dropped’ the more ‘ambitious’ studies, which analysed the effect of the retail promotions run by all the actors in a market because of a lack of predictive accuracy (his/her written words are in quotes). The authors suggest that Bayesian methodology can help open the black box and obtain more acceptable results than those obtained at present. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Albert C. Bemmaor & Philip Hans Franses, 2005. "The diffusion of marketing science in the practitioners' community: opening the black box," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(4‐5), pages 289-301, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:21:y:2005:i:4-5:p:289-301
    DOI: 10.1002/asmb.553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.553
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asmb.553?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. R Fildes & K Nikolopoulos & S F Crone & A A Syntetos, 2008. "Forecasting and operational research: a review," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(9), pages 1150-1172, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:21:y:2005:i:4-5:p:289-301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1526-4025 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.