IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/apsmbi/v15y1999i4p259-267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic graphics and model validation: an application to best‐practice production functions

Author

Listed:
  • Sergio Destefanis
  • Giovanni C. Porzio

Abstract

The aim of this work is to show how dynamic graphics can supplement, and in some instances even surrogate, techniques of model validation traditionally adopted in economic and business applications. A case study considers a production function estimated over an unbalanced panel of technically efficient countries, where standard validation tools cannot be applied. Yet, the dynamic use of the summary plot and the added variable plot allows even in this case to assess the role of potentially influential observations. Through these procedures, a simple intervention model is implemented, obtaining coefficient values more in line with a priori expectations. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergio Destefanis & Giovanni C. Porzio, 1999. "Dynamic graphics and model validation: an application to best‐practice production functions," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 259-267, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:15:y:1999:i:4:p:259-267
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1526-4025(199910/12)15:43.0.CO;2-L
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1526-4025(199910/12)15:43.0.CO;2-L
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1526-4025(199910/12)15:43.0.CO;2-L?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Massimiliano Giacalone & Demetrio Panarello & Raffaele Mattera, 2018. "Multicollinearity in regression: an efficiency comparison between Lp-norm and least squares estimators," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1831-1859, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:15:y:1999:i:4:p:259-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1526-4025 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.