IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/apechr/v65y2025i2p215-248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The onset of the British Imperial retreat from China: Evidence from the Chinese sovereign bond market in London

Author

Listed:
  • Dan Li
  • Hao Tang
  • Yajie Wang

Abstract

This study explores the British Empire's retreat from China through the lens of London investors in Chinese sovereign bonds (1898–1938). Using structural break analysis on weekly spreads between Chinese bonds—secured by British‐controlled customs and salt revenues—and British Consols, it identifies key shifts. Spreads surged over 70% during the Northern Expedition (1926–1928), coinciding with Britain's shift from ‘gunboat diplomacy’ to concessions, signalling investor perceptions of declining imperial oversight. A subsequent break at the Expedition's conclusion saw spreads narrow by 24% to 54%, not due to a resurgence of British influence, but to the Nationalist Government's split from the Communist Party and Bolsheviks and its pledge to honour existing debts. However, in the post‐Expedition era, perceived risk in Chinese bonds rose, reflected in a sharp increase in bond return volatility and a heightened co‐movement between London and domestic bond returns. Realising their government could no longer guarantee the credibility of Chinese bonds, London investors adjusted their strategy, closely tracking developments in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Dan Li & Hao Tang & Yajie Wang, 2025. "The onset of the British Imperial retreat from China: Evidence from the Chinese sovereign bond market in London," Asia-Pacific Economic History Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(2), pages 215-248, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:apechr:v:65:y:2025:i:2:p:215-248
    DOI: 10.1111/aehr.70005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/aehr.70005
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/aehr.70005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apechr:v:65:y:2025:i:2:p:215-248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)2832-157X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.