IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/amposc/v61y2017i4p804-819.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Vicarious Bases of Perceived Injustice

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffery J. Mondak
  • Jon Hurwitz
  • Mark Peffley
  • Paul Testa

Abstract

Profound differences exist in how Americans from various racial and ethnic groups view police and court officials. We argue that vicarious experiences contribute to this racial and ethnic divide. Drawing on research on social communication, social network composition, and negativity biases in perception and judgment, we devise a theoretical framework to articulate why vicarious experiences magnify racial and ethnic disparities in evaluations of judicial actors. Four hypotheses are tested using original survey data from the state of Washington. Results provide strong evidence that vicarious experiences influence citizens’ evaluations of both police and courts, and they do so in a manner that widens racial divides in how those actors are perceived.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffery J. Mondak & Jon Hurwitz & Mark Peffley & Paul Testa, 2017. "The Vicarious Bases of Perceived Injustice," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(4), pages 804-819, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:amposc:v:61:y:2017:i:4:p:804-819
    DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12297
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ajps.12297?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:amposc:v:61:y:2017:i:4:p:804-819. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1540-5907 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.