IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/amposc/v60y2016i4p1063-1076.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Logic of Collective Inaction: Senatorial Delay in Executive Nominations

Author

Listed:
  • Ian Ostrander

Abstract

While most executive nominees are successfully confirmed, this success masks wide variation in how long it takes the Senate to decide. Delay of critical nominees influences the character and effectiveness of agencies while hampering the policy ambitions of presidents. The exact logic of which nominees are targeted for delay and why, however, remains difficult to uncover. Building on prior literature, this project suggests that delay can be used to protect allied agencies from presidential politicization. Using a data set of several thousand executive nominations from 1987 to 2012, the ideological predisposition of an agency relative to the president is demonstrated to influence senatorial delay. Ultimately, these findings help explain why some nominees are delayed while other, seemingly similar, nominees are not.

Suggested Citation

  • Ian Ostrander, 2016. "The Logic of Collective Inaction: Senatorial Delay in Executive Nominations," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(4), pages 1063-1076, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:amposc:v:60:y:2016:i:4:p:1063-1076
    DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12208
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ajps.12208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:amposc:v:60:y:2016:i:4:p:1063-1076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1540-5907 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.