IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/amposc/v51y2007i1p34-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Familiarity Breed Contempt? The Impact of Information on Mass Attitudes toward Congress

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffery J. Mondak
  • Edward G. Carmines
  • Robert Huckfeldt
  • Dona‐Gene Mitchell
  • Scot Schraufnagel

Abstract

Two features of citizen response to Congress can be taken as grounds for concern. First, Americans know relatively little about Congress, and especially about congressional procedures and policy output. Second, Congress typically emerges as the least respected political institution. Although these matters are troubling when viewed individually, more disturbing is the dilemma posed when knowledge and attitudes toward Congress are viewed in tandem. It appears that citizens who know Congress the best like Congress the least. Consequently, a sophisticated polity and a well‐respected legislature seem fundamentally incompatible. This article seeks to resolve this dilemma, contending that there is nothing about knowledge per se that leads citizens to view Congress unfavorably. Rather, differences in knowledge levels alter the considerations citizens bring to bear when evaluating Congress, with the best‐informed individuals constructing judgments on the basis of the most relevant Congress‐specific criteria while less knowledgeable citizens employ readily available but more peripheral criteria.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffery J. Mondak & Edward G. Carmines & Robert Huckfeldt & Dona‐Gene Mitchell & Scot Schraufnagel, 2007. "Does Familiarity Breed Contempt? The Impact of Information on Mass Attitudes toward Congress," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(1), pages 34-48, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:amposc:v:51:y:2007:i:1:p:34-48
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00235.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00235.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00235.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:amposc:v:51:y:2007:i:1:p:34-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1540-5907 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.