IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/amposc/v47y2003i2p318-332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutionalizing Peace: Power Sharing and Post‐Civil War Conflict Management

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Hartzell
  • Matthew Hoddie

Abstract

This article examines how power‐sharing institutions might best be designed to stabilize the transition to enduring peace among former adversaries following the negotiated settlement of civil wars. We identify four different forms of power sharing based on whether the intent of the policy is to share or divide power among rivals along its political, territorial, military, or economic dimension. Employing the statistical methodology of survival analysis to examine the 38 civil wars resolved via the process of negotiations between 1945 and 1998, we find that the more dimensions of power sharing among former combatants specified in a peace agreement the higher is the likelihood that peace will endure. We suggest that this relationship obtains because of the unique capacity of power‐sharing institutions to foster a sense of security among former enemies and encourage conditions conducive to a self‐enforcing peace.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Hartzell & Matthew Hoddie, 2003. "Institutionalizing Peace: Power Sharing and Post‐Civil War Conflict Management," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(2), pages 318-332, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:amposc:v:47:y:2003:i:2:p:318-332
    DOI: 10.1111/1540-5907.00022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5907.00022
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1540-5907.00022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sara McLaughlin Mitchell, 2017. "Dangerous bargains with the devil? Incorporating new approaches in peace science for the study of war," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 34(1), pages 98-116, January.
    2. Galindo-Silva, Hector, 2021. "Political openness and armed conflict: Evidence from local councils in Colombia," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    3. Sabine C Carey & Belén González, 2021. "The legacy of war: The effect of militias on postwar repression," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 38(3), pages 247-269, May.
    4. Massimo Morelli & Laura Ogliari & Long Hong, 2023. "Power Mismatch and Civil Conflict:An Empirical Investigation," Working Papers 703, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    5. Mehmet Gurses & Nicolas Rost, 2013. "Sustaining the peace after ethnic civil wars," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 30(5), pages 469-491, November.
    6. Janina Isabel Steinert & Sonja Grimm, 2015. "Too good to be true? United Nations peacebuilding and the democratization of war-torn states," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 32(5), pages 513-535, November.
    7. Abu-Bader, Suleiman & Ianchovichina, Elena, 2019. "Polarization, foreign military intervention, and civil conflict," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    8. Chelsea Johnson, 2021. "Power-sharing, conflict resolution, and the logic of pre-emptive defection," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(4), pages 734-748, July.
    9. Satoshi Tanaka, 2020. "Power Sharing and Patronage Ethnic Politics: The Political Economy of Ethnic Party Dominance in the Dayton Bosnia," OSIPP Discussion Paper 20E005, Osaka School of International Public Policy, Osaka University.
    10. Desha M. Girod, 2015. "Reducing postconflict coup risk: The low windfall coup-proofing hypothesis," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 32(2), pages 153-174, April.
    11. Jessica Maves Braithwaite & Joseph M Cox & Margaret Farry, 2022. "Tactics of resistance and post-conflict judicial independence," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 59(6), pages 779-793, November.
    12. Nicholas Haas & Prabin B. Khadka, 2020. "If They Endorse It, I Can't Trust It: How Outgroup Leader Endorsements Undercut Public Support for Civil War Peace Settlements," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(4), pages 982-1000, October.
    13. Maekawa Wakako, 2021. "Strategic Territorial Power-Sharing and Multi-Party Bargaining in Civil Wars," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 27(1), pages 91-117, February.
    14. Paniagua, Victoria & Vogler, Jan P., 2022. "Economic elites and the constitutional design of sharing political power," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110926, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Clayton Thyne, 2017. "The impact of coups d’état on civil war duration," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 34(3), pages 287-307, May.
    16. Helga Malmin Binningsbø, 2013. "Power sharing, peace and democracy: Any obvious relationships?," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 16(1), pages 89-112, March.
    17. Marine Gassier, 2023. "Armed groups' modes of local engagement and post-conflict (in)stability: Insights from the Ethiopian and Somali civil wars," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2023-17, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    18. Megha Ram & Kaare Wallace Strøm, 2014. "Mutual veto and power-sharing," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 17(4), pages 343-358, December.
    19. Angelika Rettberg & Federico Dupont, 2022. "Peace Agreement Implementation (PAI): What Matters? A Review of the Literature," Documentos CEDE 20509, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    20. Lisa Hultman & Jacob D. Kathman & Megan Shannon, 2016. "United Nations peacekeeping dynamics and the duration of post-civil conflict peace," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 33(3), pages 231-249, July.
    21. Martin Ottmann & Johannes Vüllers, 2015. "The Power-Sharing Event Dataset (PSED): A new dataset on the promises and practices of power-sharing in post-conflict countries1," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 32(3), pages 327-350, July.
    22. Joseph M Cox, 2020. "Negotiating justice: Ceasefires, peace agreements, and post-conflict justice," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 57(3), pages 466-481, May.
    23. Felix Haass, 2021. "The democracy dilemma. Aid, power-sharing governments, and post-conflict democratization," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 38(2), pages 200-223, March.
    24. Constantin Ruhe, 2021. "Impeding fatal violence through third-party diplomacy: The effect of mediation on conflict intensity," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(4), pages 687-701, July.
    25. Victoria Paniagua & Jan P. Vogler, 2022. "Economic elites and the constitutional design of sharing political power," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 25-52, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:amposc:v:47:y:2003:i:2:p:318-332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1540-5907 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.