IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Too Loose for Comfort

  • John C. Michaelson
  • Sébastien E.J. Walker
Registered author(s):

    This paper argues that the benefits of the current US and UK monetary policy are limited and outweighed by significant costs. The policy of low or negative real interest rates, combined with quantitative easing, may be helpful to large companies and large banks. However, due in part to changes in the financial system over the past 30 years, the policy has not resulted in sufficiently lower borrowing costs or increased access to credit, especially by job-producing SMEs, to compensate for the adverse impact on savers, endowments, pension funds, insurance companies and others. We conclude that the policy is probably retarding rather than assisting economic recovery and that funds used for quantitative easing could be more usefully put towards a form of ‘credit easing’.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by World Economics, Economic & Financial Publishing, 1 Ivory Square, Plantation Wharf, London, United Kingdom, SW11 3UE in its journal World Economics Journal.

    Volume (Year): 13 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 3 (July)
    Pages: 69-78

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:wej:wldecn:527
    Contact details of provider:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wej:wldecn:527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ed Jones)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.