IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/wsbjbf/v60y2026i2p17-28n1002.html

A Hybrid LLM–CBR Approach for Explainable and Stable Assessment of Academic Theses

Author

Listed:
  • Ziółkowski Artur

    (WSB Merito Gdańsk, Instytut Informatyki i Nowoczesnych Technologii, Gdańsk, Polska)

  • Tomkiewicz Paweł

    (WSB Merito Gdańsk, Instytut Informatyki i Nowoczesnych Technologii, Gdańsk, Polska)

Abstract

The assessment of master’s theses is a complex and time-consuming process, often burdened by a significant degree of subjectivity. In recent years, Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated high effectiveness in analyzing academic texts; however, their application to the evaluation of degree theses raises concerns about inconsistent decisions and limited ability to objectively verify content. This article proposes a hybrid approach that integrates LLMs with the Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) methodology to support the assessment of master’s theses by leveraging analogies to previously evaluated cases. The paper presents the system architecture, the formalization of a case representation, the integration of LLMs with a case base, and methods for evaluating the quality of assessments and their justifications. The analysis indicates that the proposed approach can enhance assessment consistency and improve transparency while preserving the role of the human evaluator as the final decision-maker.

Suggested Citation

  • Ziółkowski Artur & Tomkiewicz Paweł, 2026. "A Hybrid LLM–CBR Approach for Explainable and Stable Assessment of Academic Theses," WSB Journal of Business and Finance, Sciendo, vol. 60(2), pages 17-28.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:wsbjbf:v:60:y:2026:i:2:p:17-28:n:1002
    DOI: 10.2478/wsbjbf-2026-0010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/wsbjbf-2026-0010
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/wsbjbf-2026-0010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:wsbjbf:v:60:y:2026:i:2:p:17-28:n:1002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.