IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/wirtsc/v105y2025i8p603-606n1016.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soziale Gerechtigkeit in Deutschland: Wunsch versus Wirklichkeit

Author

Listed:
  • Enste Dominik
  • Gabel Rebecca
  • Müller Johannes
  • Potthoff Jennifer
  • Unger Barbara-Natalie

Abstract

What do Germans understand by social justice and how do they prioritise different principles of justice? A recent population survey shows that regulatory justice and equal opportunities are seen as the most important dimensions, while distributive justice is considered the least important by Germans. The international justice index of the Stiftung Familienunternehmen shows that Germany performs relatively well in terms of needs-based and intergenerational justice. However, there is a need for action in the areas of fair opportunities and fair rules, as these dimensions are most important to the population and Germany scores only mediocrely here compared to other dimensions. In order to fully utilise the potential for improvement, both a more efficient regulatory system through an effective reduction in bureaucracy and investment in the education system are necessary.

Suggested Citation

  • Enste Dominik & Gabel Rebecca & Müller Johannes & Potthoff Jennifer & Unger Barbara-Natalie, 2025. "Soziale Gerechtigkeit in Deutschland: Wunsch versus Wirklichkeit," Wirtschaftsdienst, Sciendo, vol. 105(8), pages 603-606.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:wirtsc:v:105:y:2025:i:8:p:603-606:n:1016
    DOI: 10.2478/wd-2025-0152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/wd-2025-0152
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/wd-2025-0152?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption
    • H75 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Government: Health, Education, and Welfare

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:wirtsc:v:105:y:2025:i:8:p:603-606:n:1016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.