IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/seejeb/v6y2011i2p37-43n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Reputation and Brand Architecture: the Debate

Author

Listed:
  • Hasanbegović Dalija

Abstract

This paper argues that for organizations with a branded identity structure investing in corporate reputation is not a waste of scarce resources, but a wise strategic investment that earns significant present and future economic and non-economic returns for a company. In the global market of the 21st century, corporate reputation provides a number of intangible benefits: it permits stakeholders to asses a firm's ability to deliver valued products; it indicates past interactions with a firm's stakeholders; it improves a firm's ability to recruit and preserve its primary stakeholders; along with delivering tangible (financial) benefits by enhancing a firm's ability to do better than its competitors, thus expanding its profits and revenues. These tangible and intangible benefits of favorable corporate reputation are present regardless of the brand architecture type, such that strategic investment in corporate reputation must be executed equally for all three categories of brand architecture.

Suggested Citation

  • Hasanbegović Dalija, 2011. "Corporate Reputation and Brand Architecture: the Debate," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 6(2), pages 37-43, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:seejeb:v:6:y:2011:i:2:p:37-43:n:4
    DOI: 10.2478/v10033-011-0014-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10033-011-0014-y
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/v10033-011-0014-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:seejeb:v:6:y:2011:i:2:p:37-43:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.