Author
Listed:
- Jaliu Dumitru Dragoș
(National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, Bucharest, Romania)
- Fărcăşanu-Răvar Anamaria
(The Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research and Innovation Funding (UEFISCDI), Bucharest, Romania)
Abstract
The paper investigates the potential of civic crowdfunding to become an alternative financing mechanism for Romanian social innovation initiatives. At the time being, traditional funding sources for social innovation - public grants, philanthropy, and corporate social responsibility – face growing constraints due to increasing competition (from both for-profit as well as not-for-profit entities) and increasingly restrictive eligibility conditions and evaluation criteria. In many cases, applicants develop projects to address funding criteria rather than satisfying existing social needs. Moreover, challenges remain in demonstrating social impact, particularly for early-stage ventures. The disruptive potential of crowdfunding - as an alternative to traditional funding sources – has been well-documented; thus, it is generally accepted that crowdfunding offers increased accessibility, transparency and flexibility. The current research focuses on civic crowdfunding, a participatory approach engaging citizens and public authorities in funding and delivering public goods and services, often through matchfunding. The study builds on an extensive literature review, as well as a mapping of promising practices in civic crowdfunding and matchfunding mechanisms implemented in various European cities. The paper also analyses qualitative data collected from a focus-groups with social innovators and semi-structured interviews with representatives of Romanian municipalities and supporting organisations. Research questions explored local authorities’ knowledge and perception of civic crowdfunding, as well as the degree to which social innovators are interested in civic crowdfunding programmes. Last but not least, the analysis dwelled into potential implementation obstacles, as perceived by both municipalities (as initiators and administrators of civic crowdfunding programmes) and social innovators (as beneficiaries). Findings reveal limited awareness of civic crowdfunding among both categories of stakeholders. Local municipalities perceive civic crowdfunding as challenging due to the lack of clear legal frameworks, limited administrative capacity, and insufficient expertise among municipal staff. Still, social innovators and civil society organisations show significant interest in civic crowdfunding and are looking forward to alternative financing options being implemented. Overall, the results of the research confirms the potential of civic crowdfunding as an alternative funding mechanism, while pointing out the need for capacity-building and addressing administrative challenges. Although the study is exploratory, the findings may be used to promote a more participatory approach to funding social innovation in Romanian municipalities.
Suggested Citation
Jaliu Dumitru Dragoș & Fărcăşanu-Răvar Anamaria, 2025.
"Assessing the Potential of Civic Crowdfunding as an Alternative Mechanism for Financing Social Innovation in Romania,"
Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 19(1), pages 4949-4962.
Handle:
RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:19:y:2025:i:1:p:4949-4962:n:1019
DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2025-0378
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:19:y:2025:i:1:p:4949-4962:n:1019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.