Author
Listed:
- Holotă Anamaria
(Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)
- Jebeli-Bakht-Ara Hesam
(Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)
Abstract
Global economies and societies have undergone tremendous change because of the quick development of digital technology, yet these advancements mask ingrained trends in worker exploitation, resource extraction, and geopolitical power relations. This study looks at “digital colonialism,” in which powerful international organizations and multinational corporations, primarily from wealthier countries, attempt to influence the technical environments of less developed states that have a colonial past. The research emphasizes how technical improvements maintain political and economic imbalances. Some academics highlight how multinational firms shape digital infrastructures, while others concentrate on the geopolitical ramifications of labor exploitation and resource extraction in former colonies. Empirical studies that identify the material underpinnings of digital technologies and their neocolonial implications are still lacking, nevertheless. To fill this gap, our study analyzes the extraction of essential raw resources, namely aluminum from Guinea and cobalt from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), to show how digitization contributes to the perpetuation of colonial activities. We examine (1) which former colonies own these vital resources, (2) the volume and direction of resource exports, and (3) the manufacturing and sale of completed technological items using data from the Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC) for 2022. We reveal the exploitative circumstances under which these resources are sourced and their wider geopolitical ramifications through document analysis and case studies. Despite supposedly advocating for a more environmentally friendly future, our research shows that the EU’s sustainability and digital objectives mostly depend on exploitative methods that are reminiscent of colonial-era exploitation. Economic dependency and environmental degradation in supplier countries are sustained by the Global South’s ongoing raw material extraction and refining as well as the industrial supremacy of middle-tier powers like China. The moral dilemma of sustainability initiatives that subtly perpetuate past injustices is highlighted by this study. By emphasizing the continued existence of neocolonial dependencies in the digital economy and advocating for a more inclusive approach to global digitalization, this study adds to the current conversations on techno-colonialism. The study also emphasizes the necessity of decolonizing digital infrastructures and ensuring that marginalized voices are included in shaping the future of digital economies.
Suggested Citation
Holotă Anamaria & Jebeli-Bakht-Ara Hesam, 2025.
"Globalization and Digitalization: A New Form of Colonialism? Digital Economic Dependence in the Global South,"
Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 19(1), pages 432-443.
Handle:
RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:19:y:2025:i:1:p:432-443:n:1003
DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2025-0036
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:19:y:2025:i:1:p:432-443:n:1003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.