IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/poicbe/v19y2025i1p1235-1247n1016.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Analysis of Credit Scoring Models and Generative AI Techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Bozagiu Andreea-Mădălina

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Mihai Georgian-Dănuț

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Neacşu Andrei Costin

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Neacşu George Alexandru

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

This paper compares traditional credit scoring methods, deep learning models, and large language models (LLMs), using synthetic data to protect privacy and ensure consistency. Credit scoring has traditionally used methods like logistic regression and new AI models which may improve prediction accuracy. In this paper it was tested and evaluated these baseline methods (logistic regression), deep learning (Gradient Boosting Machine and Neural Networks), and LLM-based models for feature extraction and prediction looking at performance in areas like accuracy, precision, and recall. The results show that deep learning and LLM-based models perform better with complex data, while traditional models still work well with lower computational demands. This paper provides valuable insights into balancing accuracy, interpretability, and computational efficiency when developing credit scoring models.

Suggested Citation

  • Bozagiu Andreea-Mădălina & Mihai Georgian-Dănuț & Neacşu Andrei Costin & Neacşu George Alexandru, 2025. "A Comparative Analysis of Credit Scoring Models and Generative AI Techniques," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 19(1), pages 1235-1247.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:19:y:2025:i:1:p:1235-1247:n:1016
    DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2025-0098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2025-0098
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/picbe-2025-0098?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:19:y:2025:i:1:p:1235-1247:n:1016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.