IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/poicbe/v17y2023i1p169-177n14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Brutal Examination: The Efficiency of Defense Policies on Military Expenditure, in the Context of Ukraine War

Author

Listed:
  • Bran Alexandra-Carmen

    (1 Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

This research endeavors to demonstrate how military spending contributes to increased peace, protection, security, and the safety of a nation’s population. War, however, reveals dishonesty in peacetime with terrible clarity. The Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022, accompanied by a rise in defense budgets, could offer impetus for reorganizing collaborative defense programs. The risks to Europe must be identified and articulated in order to justify increased defense spending. In retrospect, the conventional danger posed by Russia appears less formidable than previously believed, but the job of restoring depleted capabilities is tremendous. Thus, the European defense policy affords chances to spend more and more effectively - these must be properly reevaluated. The policy has garnered tremendous public interest but has yielded minimal results. It has been robust in terms of rhetoric, but weak in terms of actual military and resource commitments. This essay provides a critical economic analysis of European defense policy. It identifies the policy issue, the economics of the issue, future opportunities, and obstacles to obtaining more and improved spending. The objective is to demonstrate how economic analysis may be applied to the intricacies of European defense policy. Economic efficiency criteria indicate the role of end outputs, substitution, and competition to the design of European defense policy, although military-political considerations are more likely to affect the ultimate outcomes than economic efficiency criteria.

Suggested Citation

  • Bran Alexandra-Carmen, 2023. "A Brutal Examination: The Efficiency of Defense Policies on Military Expenditure, in the Context of Ukraine War," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 169-177, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:169-177:n:14
    DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2023-0019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2023-0019
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/picbe-2023-0019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keith Hartley & Derek Braddon, 2014. "Collaborative projects and the number of partner nations," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 535-548, December.
    2. Keith Hartley, 2018. "The Economics of European Defense Industrial Policy," Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management, in: Nikolaos Karampekios & Iraklis Oikonomou & Elias G. Carayannis (ed.), The Emergence of EU Defense Research Policy, chapter 0, pages 77-92, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. ., 2014. "International collaboration: the reality," Chapters, in: The Political Economy of Aerospace Industries, chapter 13, pages 225-252, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. ., 2014. "Industry conduct and performance," Chapters, in: The Political Economy of Aerospace Industries, chapter 7, pages 117-140, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:169-177:n:14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.