IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/poicbe/v16y2022i1p59-81n23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigation of the 2019-2021 National Evaluation exam: A case study of high school admissions in Bucharest

Author

Listed:
  • Firescu Alexandra-Maria

    (Faculty of Administration and Business, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Necula Marian

    (Economic Cybernetics and Statistics Doctoral School, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Băsu Cecilia Emanuela

    (Economic Cybernetics and Statistics Doctoral School, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Ardelean Andreea

    (Faculty of Administration and Business, University of Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Roşu Maria-Magdalena

    (Economic Cybernetics and Statistics Doctoral School, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Milea Eduard C.

    (Economic Cybernetics and Statistics Doctoral School, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Păun Mihaela

    (Faculty of Administration and Business, University of Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

With knowledge being at the center of societal development, global policy forums, such as OECD, promote policies to improve national education systems. According to the most recent PISA evaluation, 40% of Romanian 15-year students are considered functionally illiterate. The Romanian education system’s mission to catch up with international standards was challenged by the policy shocks following the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. In an attempt to adapt to the new situation, the Minister of Education implemented a substantial reduction of the curricula covered by the National Evaluation exam held in 2020. In 2021, the exam was restructured so to resemble the PISA tests. The purpose of this paper is to investigate how these changes have impacted the Romanian upper education system. We used the 2019-2021 high school admission data published by the Ministry of Education. Our results indicate apparent progress of high school efficacy due to the inflationary grade effects. We provided an alternative metric based not on grades but high school candidates’ rank. The classification of high schools based on this instrument is revealed as more robust. Most high schools in Bucharest run in the lowest performance category with the upper education system relying on a few top-performing high schools. For administrators and policymakers, this type of instrument is crucial for a proper evaluation of educational institution efficacy and authentic progress. This type of evaluation is the first action in the process to meet OECD requirements to close the gap between the lowest and highest education institutions in the EECA region.

Suggested Citation

  • Firescu Alexandra-Maria & Necula Marian & Băsu Cecilia Emanuela & Ardelean Andreea & Roşu Maria-Magdalena & Milea Eduard C. & Păun Mihaela, 2022. "Investigation of the 2019-2021 National Evaluation exam: A case study of high school admissions in Bucharest," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 59-81, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:59-81:n:23
    DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2022-0008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2022-0008
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/picbe-2022-0008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:59-81:n:23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.